Population opinion on current material situation
Assessment of living standards based on perceived financial well-being. The indicator reflects how individuals assess their current material situation. The statistics incorporate responses regarding the sufficiency of funds for a standard lifestyle, providing insight into social sentiment. The data are based on surveys where respondents self-assess their level of prosperity at a specific point in time
Chart showing quarterly dynamics of public opinion on material well-being
See also
- Average old-age pension in Russia by year long time series by year
- Average per capita monetary incomes of the population by years long time series by year
- Gini coefficient in Russia by year long time series by year
- Number of retirees in Russia by year long time series by year
- Outbound tourism of Russians by year long time series by year
- Palma ratio in Russia by year long time series by year
- Poverty level in Russia by year long time series by year
- Real incomes of Russia's population by years long time series by year
- Subsistence minimum in Russia by year long time series by year
- Средняя пенсия в России по годам: 2017-2026, графики indicator breakdown
- На что россияне тратят деньги: структура расходов 2025 indicator breakdown
- Потребление продуктов в России по годам: 1990–2024 indicator breakdown
- Прожиточный минимум 2026 по регионам: таблица и графики indicator breakdown
- Коэффициент Джини в России 2025: неравенство доходов indicator breakdown
- Прожиточный минимум пенсионера 2026: регионы и доплата indicator breakdown
- Прожиточный минимум на ребёнка 2026: регионы и пособие indicator breakdown
- Сколько продуктов можно купить на доход в 2026 году indicator breakdown
- Прожиточный минимум в Москве 2026 и в Подмосковье indicator breakdown
- Прожиточный минимум в Свердловской области 2026 indicator breakdown
- Реальные доходы населения в 2026 году: данные Росстата indicator breakdown
- Средняя пенсия в 2026 году: сколько получают пенсионеры indicator breakdown
- Прожиточный минимум в Краснодарском крае на 2026 год indicator breakdown
- Прожиточный минимум в Санкт-Петербурге на 2026 год indicator breakdown
- Прожиточный минимум в Ростовской области на 2026 год indicator breakdown
- Прожиточный минимум в Нижегородской области на 2026 год indicator breakdown
- Прожиточный минимум в Челябинской области на 2026 год indicator breakdown
- Прожиточный минимум в Самарской области на 2026 год indicator breakdown
Set in numbers
Rosstat data. Rows: 108, indicators: 8. Breakdown by positions: 1998 — IV quarter; 1999 — I quarter; 1999 — II quarter; 1999 — III quarter; 1999 — IV quarter and others
Five highest values: 1998 — IV quarter (100), 1999 — I quarter (100), 1999 — II quarter (100), 1999 — III quarter (100), 1999 — IV quarter (100). The top five account for 20% of the total across all positions
All table numbers are series: 108
| Series | Всего | в том числе по вариантам ответа — очень хорошее | в том числе по вариантам ответа — хорошее | в том числе по вариантам ответа — среднее | в том числе по вариантам ответа — плохое | в том числе по вариантам ответа — очень плохое | в том числе по вариантам ответа — затрудняюсь ответить | в том числе по вариантам ответа |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 год — IV квартал | 100,00 | 0,30 | 13,40 | 70,30 | 14,90 | 1,10 | 0,00 | — |
| 2025 год — I квартал | 100,00 | 0,20 | 11,50 | 71,50 | 15,20 | 1,50 | 0,10 | — |
| 2025 год — II квартал | 100,00 | 0,30 | 12,60 | 69,80 | 15,80 | 1,50 | 0,00 | — |
| 2025 год — III квартал | 100,00 | 0,50 | 14,90 | 70,20 | 13,60 | 0,80 | 0,00 | — |
| 2025 год — IV квартал | 100,00 | 0,33 | 13,43 | 70,17 | 14,83 | 1,12 | 0,12 | — |
| 2026 год — I квартал | 100,00 | 0,43 | 11,54 | 69,95 | 16,89 | 1,17 | 0,03 | — |
| 2026 год — II квартал | 100,00 | 0,35 | 12,01 | 70,97 | 14,97 | 1,60 | 0,09 | — |
| 2026 год — III квартал | 100,00 | 0,61 | 12,29 | 69,81 | 15,62 | 1,67 | 0,03 | — |
How to read this table
Row differences show the quarterly dynamics of sentiment. Total values for all responses can be compared with the proportion of those who were unable to answer. Note the response option where the value is 0.7 with a total volume of 100. The data structure enables identification of prevailing response options over different periods by comparing aggregate figures with a detailed breakdown for each option
What is visible in these numbers
The set includes the following indicators: Total; including by response options — very good; including by response options — good; including by response options — average; including by response options — poor; including by response options — very poor; including by response options — difficult to answer; including by response options
Of 200 possible values, 175 (87.5%) are filled. Small gaps remain where the position was not observed in all periods
The same indicator in other breakdowns (1)
More in the section Living standards»
Period and application
The data cover the period from the fourth quarter of 1998 to the second quarter of 1999. The data are presented as a cross-section. This information assists sociologists and economists in analyzing shifts in public sentiment and understanding how external factors influenced citizens' subjective sense of financial stability during this period
How it is calculated
The structure of household expenditures shows the source of payment for your product and what will be reduced first in the event of a decline in income
Did you notice an error in this table? The parser is wrong, and most often one correction fixes many pages
Report an error Typo is easier this way: highlight it and press Ctrl + Enter