Retirement rate of agricultural machinery: write-off due to wear and tear
The disposal rate reflects the percentage of machinery written off due to wear relative to its quantity at the beginning of the year. The series includes various machine categories: tractors without earth-moving attachments, tractors with mounted earth-moving or land reclamation units, and windrow headers. The data covers the period from 2018 to 2023 and allows for assessing the intensity of fleet attrition
Graph of the disposal rate of agricultural machinery due to wear from 2018 to 2023, as a percentage of the stock at the beginning of the year
- Flax harvesters
- windrowers
- Seeders
- Forage harvesters
- Potato harvesters
- Cultivators - total
- Tractors mounted with earth-moving, land reclamation, and other machines
- Sowing machines — Milking machines and units - total
- Tractors (excluding tractors mounted with earth-moving, reclamation and other machines)
- Sowing complexes
Set in numbers
Coverage: 17 series, 2018 through 2023, 6 reporting periods. 102 values in total.
“Tractors (excluding tractors mounted with earth-moving, reclamation and other machines)” declined by 34.3% between 2018 and 2023, from 3.6 to 2.4.
All table numbers are series: 17
How to read this table
Table rows are categorized by agricultural machine type, allowing for a comparison of wear rates across different units and assemblies. One can track changes in the write-off share for standard tractors relative to specialized machines with land reclamation equipment or headers. Comparing these categories helps identify which types of machinery age or are decommissioned most rapidly
What is visible in these numbers
“Flax harvesters” leads the table with 5, “Sowing complexes” closes it with 1.3. The gap between them is 3.9-fold.
The same indicator for other periods
More in the section Bulletins on the state of agriculture (electronic versions)»
Period and application
Annual dynamics of the rates for the period 2018–2023 are presented in percentages. Data is updated annually and may be useful to agribusiness specialists, as well as those involved in procurement planning and agricultural machinery fleet renewal
Did you notice an error in this table? The parser is wrong, and most often one correction fixes many pages
Report an error Typo is easier this way: highlight it and press Ctrl + Enter