Distribution of 2020-2022 secondary vocational education graduates by labour force participation status
thousand persons
Number of 2020-2022 vocational education and training graduates in the labor force and their distribution by occupation in their last job. Table rows are broken down by occupational groups, from managers to high-skilled professionals, allowing for comparisons of how different specialties relate to employment or unemployment. Data are presented in thousands of persons, as well as employment rates in percent, covering graduates nationwide
Chart showing the distribution of 2020-2022 VET graduates by labor force status and occupation, in thousands of persons
See also
- Average salary in Russia by year long time series by year
- Number of employed in Russia by year long time series by year
- Unemployment rate in Russia by year long time series by year
- Уровень безработицы по годам: 2,2% в 2025, таблица с 2000 indicator breakdown
- Уровень занятости в России по годам: 2000-2025 indicator breakdown
- Уровень безработицы в 2026 году: 2,2%, данные Росстата indicator breakdown
Set in numbers
44 series in thousand persons, arranged across 5 breakdowns rather than over time. 211 values in total.
The largest value belongs to “Professionals” — 97.9 thousand persons; the smallest is “Total” at 81 thousand persons.
All table numbers are series: 44
How to read this table
Rows reflect various categories of employed and unemployed persons, including managers and high-skilled professionals. Aggregate figures for all graduates can be compared with data for specific occupational groups to identify differences in employment levels. Indicators include labor force size, employment rate, and other parameters to assess the demand for specialists in the labor market
More in the section Labour resources, employment and unemployment»
Period and application
Data for the 2020-2022 graduating cohorts prepared by Rosstat to analyze the post-graduation labor market situation. Information in thousands of persons and percent is useful for HR departments, educational institutions, and labor market researchers to evaluate the effectiveness of vocational education
Did you notice an error in this table? The parser is wrong, and most often one correction fixes many pages
Report an error Typo is easier this way: highlight it and press Ctrl + Enter