Procurement efficiency indicators of Rosstat central apparatus: changes
The procurement quality assessment for the Rosstat central office is based on several criteria, including the number of amendments to the procurement schedule and the final efficiency score. The table contains five rows, each assigned to a specific structural unit. The columns allow for tracking from administrative management to the final score in categories ranging from low to high. The indicators record the current status for the reporting year without reference to specific dates
Rosstat central office procurement efficiency indicators: schedule changes and final score
Set in numbers
5 series, arranged across 10 breakdowns rather than over time. 35 values in total.
The largest value belongs to “2” — 96; the smallest is “6” at 58.
All table numbers are series: 5
| Series | Структурное подразделение — Административное управление | Структурное подразделение | П1 Кол-во изменений плана-графика закупок — 100 | П2 Доля неиспользованных на конец отчетного периода бюджетных ассигнований — 100 | П3 Относительная экономия бюджетных средств по результатам осущ-я закупок конкурентными способами — 0 | П4 Среднее кол-во заявок, поданныхна участие в процедурах определения поставщика, подрядчика, исполнителя — 0 | П5 Доля несостоявшихся закупок — 0 | П6 Доля контрактов с ненадлежащим исполнением обязательств, предусмотренных контрактом — 100 | Пэф. Итоговый показатель эффективности закупок в отчетном году — 100 | Оценка эффективности закупок — Высокая |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | — | — | 75,00 | 100,00 | 100,00 | 100,00 | 100,00 | 100,00 | 96,00 | — |
| 3 | — | — | 25,00 | 100,00 | 50,00 | 75,00 | 100,00 | 100,00 | 75,00 | — |
| 4 | — | — | 0,00 | 100,00 | 50,00 | 75,00 | 100,00 | 100,00 | 70,80 | — |
| 5 | — | — | 0,00 | 100,00 | 100,00 | 100,00 | 100,00 | 0,00 | 66,70 | — |
| 6 | — | — | 0,00 | 100,00 | 50,00 | 100,00 | 100,00 | 0,00 | 58,00 | — |
How to read this table
The rows in the list differ by their respective departments, allowing for performance comparison. Data should be compared using key parameters, such as the number of schedule changes or the final score. For example, row two records 75 schedule changes and a final efficiency score of 96 out of 100. This approach helps identify the most disciplined and efficient departments within the agency's structure
What is visible in these numbers
The table is 70% filled: Rosstat does not publish every cell, and the gaps are left as they are rather than interpolated.
More in the section Statistics on procurement by the central office of Rosstat»
Period and application
The data is current for the reporting year and does not include time series. The information is presented as a snapshot, which is useful for auditing and ongoing activity monitoring. This data is useful for procurement specialists, internal control officers, and department heads to analyze the quality of resource management
Did you notice an error in this table? The parser is wrong, and most often one correction fixes many pages
Report an error Typo is easier this way: highlight it and press Ctrl + Enter