Assessment of resource productivity in Russia
at constant 2021 prices
The efficiency of natural resource use in the Russian economy is assessed by a productivity indicator, presented here in constant 2021 prices for the period from 2018 to 2023. The rows provide data for three categories: fuel and energy minerals in rubles per kilogram of fuel equivalent, water resources in thousands of rubles per cubic meter, and agricultural land in thousands of rubles per hectare. The breakdown by resource type allows for comparing the return from each individually, tracking changes in the indicator over six years
Chart of resource productivity assessment in Russia by resource type from 2018 to 2023
- Fuel and energy minerals, RUB/kg of fuel equivalent
- Water resources (withdrawn from water bodies), thousand RUB/m3
- Agricultural land, thousand RUB/ha
- Forest (wood) resources, thousand RUB/m3
- Hunting resources, thousand RUB/head
- Hydrobionts, thousand RUB/t
See also
- GDP per capita in Russia by year long time series by year
- Russia's GDP by year long time series by year
- ВВП России по годам: 1995-2025, таблица и графики indicator breakdown
- ВВП на душу населения России: рубли, доллары и ППС indicator breakdown
- ВРП регионов России 2024: рейтинг и доля Москвы indicator breakdown
- ВВП России в 2026 году: итоги полугодия по данным Росстата indicator breakdown
Set in numbers
Coverage: 6 series in at constant 2021 prices, 2018 through 2023, 6 reporting periods. 36 values in total.
Between 2018 and 2023 “Fuel and energy minerals, RUB/kg of fuel equivalent” rose from 124 to 131 — 5.5%.
All table numbers are series: 6
| Series | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Топливно-энергетические полезные ископаемые, руб/кг условного топлива | 124,36 | 128,95 | 127,71 | 126,78 | 129,97 | 131,20 |
| Водные ресурсы (забираемые из водных объектов), тыс руб/м3 | 1,86 | 1,93 | 2,08 | 2,11 | 2,04 | 2,00 |
| Земли сельскохозяйственных угодий, тыс руб/га | 20,23 | 20,94 | 21,09 | 21,06 | 23,06 | 22,41 |
| Лесные (древесные) ресурсы, тыс руб/м3 | 4,82 | 5,40 | 5,56 | 5,79 | 6,43 | 6,82 |
| Охотничьи ресурсы, тыс руб/особь | 14,15 | 14,87 | 14,89 | 17,25 | 14,04 | 13,95 |
| Гидробионты, тыс руб/т | 110,79 | 116,02 | 114,30 | 117,38 | 106,92 | 111,41 |
How to read this table
Differences between rows are due to the specific nature of the resource being measured; therefore, for productivity analysis, values should be compared within each category across different years. The fuel and energy minerals series, for example, shows a trend from 124.3606085 in 2018 to 131.1952961 in 2023. Comparing data by year within a single row demonstrates changes in the efficiency of using a specific type of natural resource, providing insight into the effectiveness of its involvement in the country's economic turnover
What is visible in these numbers
The largest value belongs to “Fuel and energy minerals, RUB/kg of fuel equivalent” — 131 at constant 2021 prices; the smallest is “Water resources (withdrawn from water bodies), thousand RUB/m3” at 2 at constant 2021 prices. The gap between them is 65.6-fold.
The same indicator for other periods
These series cannot be stitched together Over the common period 2018 values diverge — Rosstat recalculated the indicator using a revised methodology. They cannot be combined into a single chart: a break would appear at the junction, which did not actually occur
| Indicator for 2018 | here | in the adjacent series | divergence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Топливно-энергетические полезные ископаемые, руб/кг условного топлива | 124,4 | 86,5 | −37,9 |
| Водные ресурсы (забираемые из водных объектов), тыс руб/м3 | 1,9 | 1,3 | −0,6 |
| Земли сельскохозяйственных угодий, тыс руб/га | 20,2 | 13,6 | −6,7 |
| Лесные (древесные) ресурсы, тыс руб/м3 | 4,8 | 3,3 | −1,5 |
| Охотничьи ресурсы, тыс руб/особь | 14,2 | 6,0 | −8,2 |
| Гидробионты, тыс руб/т | 110,8 | 69,0 | −41,8 |
More in the section National accounts»
Period and application
The statistics cover the period from 2018 to 2023 and are updated annually by Rosstat as national accounts are compiled. These figures are useful for economists, ecologists, and natural resource management specialists who need to understand the link between resource consumption and the value created in the economy
Did you notice an error in this table? The parser is wrong, and most often one correction fixes many pages
Report an error Typo is easier this way: highlight it and press Ctrl + Enter