Number of cultural and leisure organizations by year
thou
The table provides the number of cultural and leisure organizations, including rural branches. It compares the number of organizations across three key years in Soviet and Russian history
Number of cultural and leisure organizations in 1927, 1940, and 1950
- Число организаций культурно- досугового типа — Culture and leisure organizations
- в том числе — including — в городах и поселках городского типа
- в том числе — в сельской местности
- Годы — Year
- Число организаций культурно- досугового типа — Culture and leisure or-ganizations
- в том числе — including — в городах и поселках городского типа
- в том числе — в сельской местности
See also
- Divorces in Russia by year long time series by year
- Marriages in Russia by year long time series by year
- Перевозки пассажиров в России по годам: статистика indicator breakdown
Set in numbers
7 series are published here in thousands / thou, from 1927 to 2013, 12 reporting periods. 80 values in total.
“Число организаций культурно- досугового типа — Culture and leisure organizations” multiplied by 2.3 between 1927 and 2013: from 18.3 to 42.4. The highest value in the series is 78.7 in 1970.
All table numbers are series: 7
| Series | 1927 | 1940 | 1950 | 1960 | 1970 | 1980 | 1990 | 2000 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Число организаций культурно- досугового типа — Culture and leisure organizations | 18,30 | 74,10 | 66,30 | 73,50 | 78,70 | 77,50 | 73,20 | 54,80 | 46,60 | 45,00 | 43,70 | 42,40 |
| в том числе — including — в городах и поселках городского типа | 2,60 | 5,50 | 4,80 | 7,40 | 9,90 | 9,80 | 10,60 | 6,70 | 5,50 | 5,30 | 5,20 | 5,10 |
| в том числе — в сельской местности | 15,70 | 68,60 | 61,50 | 66,10 | 68,80 | 67,70 | 62,60 | 48,10 | 41,10 | 39,70 | 38,50 | 37,20 |
| Годы — Year | 2 014,00 | 2 015,00 | 2 016,00 | 2 017,00 | 2 018,00 | 2 019,00 | 2 020,00 | 2 021,00 | 2 022,00 | 2 023,00 | 2 024,00 | — |
| Число организаций культурно- досугового типа — Culture and leisure or-ganizations | 42,10 | 40,30 | 41,30 | 42,50 | 42,80 | 42,70 | 42,40 | 42,20 | 41,80 | 41,50 | 41,20 | — |
| в том числе — including — в городах и поселках городского типа | 5,20 | 4,90 | 5,00 | 4,90 | 4,90 | 5,10 | 5,10 | 5,10 | 5,00 | 4,90 | 4,90 | — |
| в том числе — в сельской местности | 36,90 | 35,40 | 36,30 | 37,60 | 37,90 | 37,60 | 37,40 | 37,10 | 36,80 | 36,50 | 36,30 | — |
How to read this table
The first row shows the total number of organizations, while the second shows only those located in rural areas. The difference reflects the geographic distribution of cultural infrastructure
What is visible in these numbers
The largest value belongs to “Годы — Year” — 2,024 thousands / thou; the smallest is “в том числе — including — в городах и поселках городского типа” at 4.9 thousands / thou. The gap between them is 413-fold.
The table is 95% filled: Rosstat does not publish every cell, and the gaps are left as they are rather than interpolated.
The same indicator for other periods
These series cannot be stitched together Over the common period 1927 values diverge — Rosstat recalculated the indicator using a revised methodology. They cannot be combined into a single chart: a break would appear at the junction, which did not actually occur
| Indicator for 1927 | here | in the adjacent series | divergence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Число организаций культурно- досугового типа — Culture and leisure organizations | 18,3 | 18,3 | +0,0 |
| в том числе — including — в городах и поселках городского типа | 2,6 | 5,1 | +2,5 |
| в том числе — в сельской местности | 15,7 | 37,2 | +21,5 |
| Годы — Year | 2 014,0 | 2 013,0 | −1,0 |
| Число организаций культурно- досугового типа — Culture and leisure or-ganizations | 42,1 | 42,4 | +0,3 |
| в том числе — including — в городах и поселках городского типа | 5,2 | 5,1 | −0,1 |
| в том числе — в сельской местности | 36,9 | 37,2 | +0,3 |
More in the section Russian Statistical Yearbook»
Period and application
Data are presented for years marked by significant changes in cultural policy. The information is updated annually and is intended for specialists in cultural history and cultural institution management
Did you notice an error in this table? The parser is wrong, and most often one correction fixes many pages
Report an error Typo is easier this way: highlight it and press Ctrl + Enter