Marketability of marketed sugar beet in farms of all categories
The share of sugar beet sales in total production reflects the level of product marketability across different farm types. Table rows include indicators for the Russian Federation, federal districts, and specific regions, such as Belgorod Oblast. Columns are categorized by market participants, including all farm types and individual entrepreneur farms
Chart of sugar beet sales marketability by farm category in percent
Set in numbers
The table is a snapshot — 30 series shown across 4 breakdowns. 100 values in total.
The largest value belongs to “Oryol Region” — 100; the smallest is “Chuvash Republic - Chuvashia” at 55.1.
All table numbers are series: 30
| Series | Хозяйства всех категорий | Сельскохозяйственные организации | Хозяйства населения | Крестьянские (фермерские) хозяйства и индивидуальные предприниматели |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Российская Федерация | 90,32 | 90,55 | 99,36 | 88,16 |
| Центральный федеральный округ | 95,12 | 95,31 | 99,77 | 92,04 |
| Белгородская область | 102,14 | 104,48 | 94,26 | 55,22 |
| Брянская область | 76,91 | 75,51 | — | 90,50 |
| Воронежская область | 97,79 | 97,63 | 100,00 | 99,44 |
| Курская область | 92,96 | 93,02 | 100,00 | 91,89 |
| Липецкая область | 103,57 | 104,36 | 100,00 | 94,36 |
| Орловская область | 88,79 | 88,75 | — | 100,00 |
| Рязанская область | 100,00 | 100,00 | — | — |
| Тамбовская область | 84,90 | 84,40 | — | 93,86 |
| Тульская область | 93,59 | 93,54 | — | 96,00 |
| Южный федеральный округ | 83,38 | 82,41 | 100,00 | 88,76 |
| Краснодарский край | 84,56 | 83,93 | 100,00 | 88,46 |
| Волгоградская область | 65,99 | 65,99 | — | — |
| Ростовская область | 72,25 | 64,68 | — | 90,16 |
| Северо-Кавказский федеральный округ | 91,43 | 93,72 | — | 76,85 |
| Карачаево-Черкесская Республика | 52,71 | 46,78 | — | 69,63 |
| Ставропольский край | 96,85 | 99,24 | — | 79,07 |
| Приволжский федеральный округ | 82,83 | 82,35 | 90,16 | 85,04 |
| Республика Башкортостан | 58,51 | 53,90 | — | 75,16 |
| Республика Мордовия | 83,44 | 83,00 | 88,57 | 91,15 |
| Республика Татарстан (Татарстан) | 95,54 | 97,09 | 90,00 | 88,37 |
| Чувашская Республика - Чувашия | 73,22 | 90,91 | 100,02 | 55,10 |
| Нижегородская область | 79,34 | 81,86 | 96,92 | 56,69 |
| Оренбургская область | 149,70 | 148,99 | — | — |
| Пензенская область | 86,01 | 85,10 | — | 91,41 |
| Саратовская область | 88,31 | 88,71 | — | 87,65 |
| Ульяновская область | 94,68 | 96,15 | — | 92,03 |
| Сибирский федеральный округ | 82,50 | 82,37 | — | 87,83 |
| Алтайский край | 82,50 | 82,37 | — | 87,83 |
How to read this table
Comparing rows helps determine whether large agribusinesses or small farms are more efficient at selling surplus production in specific constituent entities. Marketability levels in the Central Federal District can be compared with national averages to identify regional specifics. Differences between columns show the proportion of the sugar beet harvest sold to the market versus the amount retained within the farms
What is visible in these numbers
The table is 88% filled: Rosstat does not publish every cell, and the gaps are left as they are rather than interpolated.
The same indicator in other breakdowns (3)
More in the section Bulletins on the state of agriculture (electronic versions)»
Period and application
The statistics are provided as a single snapshot by farm category, without time-series data. The information is compiled from agricultural bulletins. This data is useful for agronomists, food industry investors, and agricultural market analysts
Did you notice an error in this table? The parser is wrong, and most often one correction fixes many pages
Report an error Typo is easier this way: highlight it and press Ctrl + Enter