Roschart — Russian statistics in charts

Official Rosstat statistics turned into charts instead of CSV and XLSX

RU

Marketability of sugar beet sold in Russia by categories of farms

· snapshot · rows: 31 · periods: 4 · section: Bulletins on the state of agriculture (electronic versions)

The share of sold sugar beet in total production volume depends on the farm type, and these data reflect the sales structure across different producer categories. Table rows include indicators for all of Russia, federal districts, and individual constituent entities, such as Belgorod Oblast. Columns show results for all farm categories, agricultural organizations, and peasant and farm enterprises

shown 25 largest of 31

Chart of marketability of sold sugar beet by farm category in Russia

Oryol Region 96.3 Saratov Region 94.7 Bryansk Region 91.1 Ulyanovsk Region 91.1 Penza Oblast 89.3 Stavropol Territory 89.1 Belgorod Region 87.9 Voronezh Region 86.2 Republic of Tatarstan (Tatarstan) 85.4 Central Federal District 85.2 Republic of Mordovia 85.0 Tula Region 84.9 Russian Federation 84.3 North Caucasian Federal District 84.2 Krasnodar Territory 84.2 Kursk Region 84.1 Southern Federal District 84.0 Volga Federal District 82.3 Tambov Region 82.0 Rostov Region 81.5 Belgorod Region 76.7 Republic of Bashkortostan 66.4 Nizhny Novgorod Region 57.7 Chuvash Republic - Chuvashia 43.7 Karachay-Cherkess Republic 39.7
how it will look

Set in numbers

31 series, arranged across 4 breakdowns rather than over time. 102 values in total.

“Republic of Mordovia” leads the table with 174, “Chuvash Republic - Chuvashia” closes it with 43.5. The gap between them is 4-fold.

All table numbers are series: 31
Series Хозяйства всех категорийСельскохозяйственные организацииХозяйства населенияКрестьянские (фермерские) хозяйства и индивидуальные предприниматели
Российская Федерация 84,30 83,81 99,55 89,37
Центральный федеральный округ 85,23 85,08 99,87 87,92
Белгородская область 76,68 77,13 96,00 65,90
Брянская область 91,13 91,33 — 89,13
Воронежская область 86,19 85,83 100,00 90,60
Курская область 84,08 83,61 100,00 94,52
Липецкая область 87,87 87,68 100,00 90,43
Орловская область 96,29 96,28 — 100,00
Рязанская область 93,82 93,82 — —
Тамбовская область 81,99 81,83 — 85,44
Тульская область 84,89 84,70 — 89,34
Южный федеральный округ 84,04 82,56 95,00 93,93
Краснодарский край 84,17 82,58 95,00 96,31
Волгоградская область 104,71 104,71 — —
Ростовская область 81,47 80,74 — 83,07
Северо-Кавказский федеральный округ 84,25 84,94 — 79,89
Республика Ингушетия 13,62 — — 13,62
Карачаево-Черкесская Республика 39,73 30,66 — 53,31
Ставропольский край 89,11 88,92 — 90,71
Приволжский федеральный округ 82,28 81,41 92,27 87,31
Республика Башкортостан 66,39 62,71 — 78,84
Республика Мордовия 84,96 80,19 93,13 174,02
Республика Татарстан (Татарстан) 85,39 85,00 90,00 88,28
Чувашская Республика - Чувашия 43,74 43,49 99,97 43,52
Нижегородская область 57,66 59,27 97,01 47,24
Оренбургская область 48,09 48,09 — —
Пензенская область 89,29 89,29 — 89,25
Саратовская область 94,72 97,22 — 90,69
Ульяновская область 91,10 92,17 — 88,74
Сибирский федеральный округ 79,82 79,55 — 92,01
Алтайский край 79,82 79,55 — 91,99

How to read this table

Comparing rows reveals differences in sales efficiency between large agribusiness holdings and small farmers. Nationwide, the average marketability rate is 84.3, while for peasant and farm enterprises it is higher, reaching 89.37. These differences help assess the portion of the sugar beet harvest sold to the market versus the portion kept for the producers' own needs

What is visible in these numbers

Only 88% of the cells carry a value — empty cells are missing in the source publication and are not filled in here.

The same indicator in other breakdowns (3)

More in the section Bulletins on the state of agriculture (electronic versions)»

Period and application

Statistics are compiled as part of agricultural situation bulletins. The information is relevant for analyzing agribusiness sector efficiency and sales planning. Data by farm category is useful for agronomists, investors, and representatives of the processing industry