Areas where soil-protective agricultural technologies are applied

checked 28.10.2026 · snapshot · rows: 39 · periods: 7 · section: Bulletins on the state of agriculture (electronic versions)

In 2023, various soil conservation methods were implemented in agriculture, and the areas of their use are recorded here. Table rows include data for the Russian Federation as a whole, federal districts, and individual constituent entities, totaling 39 rows. Columns are categorized by specific methods: from adaptive-landscape farming systems to mixed technologies such as no-till, strip-till, and mini-till

how it will look

Set in numbers

Rosstat data. Series: 39, indicators: 7. Table rows: Russian Federation; Central Federal District; Voronezh Oblast; Lipetsk Oblast; Southern Federal District and others

Five largest values: Russian Federation (1 487), Central Federal District (590.4), Belgorod Oblast (452.8), Volga Federal District (381), Siberian Federal District (339.8). The gap between the largest and smallest is 97 times. The top five leaders account for 56.6% of the total across all positions — the distribution is heavily skewed toward the top

All table numbers are series: 39

Series	Технология с использованием адаптивно-ландшафтной системы земледелия	Технология, соответствующая правилам производства органической продукции	Технология, соответствующая правилам производства сельскохозяйственной продукции, продовольствия, промышленной и иной продукции с улучшенными характеристиками	Технология прямого сева (no-till)	Технология strip-till	Технология mini-till	Смешанная почвозащитная технология (no-till, strip-till, mini-till)
Российская Федерация	1 281,14	201,50	347,57	1 186,63	77,84	925,01	1 487,29
Центральный федеральный округ	515,01	32,61	121,43	217,99	62,57	218,58	590,44
Белгородская область	452,81	—	—	6,63	—	14,90	251,57
Воронежская область	49,77	3,72	27,32	61,04	—	85,29	148,63
Липецкая область	2,03	—	76,01	45,44	57,52	45,71	108,84
Московская область	3,42	—	—	—	—	—	—
Орловская область	—	20,72	—	3,50	—	37,46	37,03
Тамбовская область	—	—	—	85,92	—	7,33	—
Северо-Западный федеральный округ	15,33	—	—	—	—	—	12,88
Калининградская область	15,33	—	—	—	—	5,83	10,95
Южный федеральный округ	162,94	48,30	99,59	228,80	—	105,05	166,88
Республика Крым	—	—	—	5,97	—	—	—
Краснодарский край	142,15	48,30	69,70	4,58	—	85,66	86,93
Волгоградская область	17,21	—	—	196,89	—	—	—
Ростовская область	—	—	—	21,36	—	10,10	61,08
Северо-Кавказский федеральный округ	—	—	—	—	—	14,73	30,55
Ставропольский край	—	—	—	56,77	—	—	—
Приволжский федеральный округ	185,64	—	26,04	283,45	—	381,01	126,03
Республика Башкортостан	—	—	—	8,99	—	—	—
Республика Марий Эл	71,35	—	—	—	—	—	—
Республика Татарстан	25,34	—	—	123,88	—	—	13,47
Удмуртская Республика	14,75	—	—	—	—	—	—
Чувашская Республика	6,44	—	—	—	—	—	—
Кировская область	13,16	—	—	—	—	—	—
Нижегородская область	35,96	—	—	12,93	—	13,31	25,13
Пензенская область	—	—	—	13,63	—	24,02	14,91
Самарская область	—	—	—	95,23	—	263,93	50,82
Саратовская область	—	—	—	24,44	—	49,67	—
Уральский федеральный округ	292,27	51,48	84,10	140,58	—	55,16	220,73
Курганская область	—	—	—	90,14	—	32,69	54,72
Тюменская область	88,16	31,73	43,84	—	—	—	—
Тюменская область (без автономных округов)	88,16	31,73	43,84	—	—	—	—
Челябинская область	204,11	19,75	—	35,69	—	—	141,52
Сибирский федеральный округ	107,26	56,49	—	258,59	8,17	144,66	339,78
Алтайский край	—	—	—	177,73	—	20,03	84,78
Красноярский край	—	—	—	—	—	54,95	—
Иркутская область	—	—	—	12,31	—	—	—
Новосибирская область	83,26	—	—	45,25	—	—	46,00
Омская область	—	—	—	21,63	—	51,43	197,77

How to read this table

Row comparisons show differences in technology use at the national, federal district, and regional levels. Columns group data by soil-protective method types, helping to assess the prevalence of various farming systems across different parts of Russia. The data provides a snapshot for a single calendar year, without reference to historical trends

What is visible in these numbers

Table columns: Technology using an adaptive landscape farming system; Technology complying with organic production rules...; Technology complying with agricultural production rules...; Direct seeding technology (no-till); Strip-till technology; Mini-till technology; Mixed soil-conserving technology (no-till, strip-till, mini-till)

106 out of 175 possible values are filled (60.6%). The data is sparse — observations for many positions were not conducted for the entire period, and summary totals for them should not be calculated

More in the section Bulletins on the state of agriculture (electronic versions)»

Period and application

Information from agricultural bulletins is relevant for agronomists, farmers, and land management specialists. The information covers the use of adaptive-landscape and mixed systems in food and raw material production. Data is updated as part of Rosstat's annual statistical reports

How it is calculated

Sown areas show what will be abundant and what will be scarce several months before it is reflected on the shelf

Did you notice an error in this table? The parser is wrong, and most often one correction fixes many pages

Report an error Typo is easier this way: highlight it and press Ctrl + Enter