Roschart — Russian statistics in charts

Official Rosstat statistics turned into charts instead of CSV and XLSX

RU

Yield of perennial grasses under cover crops in agricultural organizations, 2023–2024

green mass weight

· dynamics annual · rows: 25 · periods: 2 · section: Bulletins on the state of agriculture (electronic versions)

These 2023 and 2024 data show the green mass yield per unit area of perennial understory grasses. The indicator accounts for undersowing, including autumn undersowing, and is used for producing fodder, haylage, silage, grass meal, pellets, and briquettes. The rows represent different levels: figures for the Russian Federation, the Central Federal District, and the Kursk Region. Yield is measured in green mass weight

Graph of the yield of perennial understory grasses in large agricultural organizations for 2023–2024, green mass weight

unchanged Southern Federal District · 2024: 182.8 green mass weight · 2023: 110.2 · +72.5 Southern Federal District +72.5 Volga Federal District · 2024: 193.8 green mass weight · 2023: 143.5 · +50.3 Volga Federal District +50.3 Kursk Region · 2024: 99.7 green mass weight · 2023: 50.9 · +48.8 Kursk Region +48.8 Ural Federal District · 2024: 90.1 green mass weight · 2023: 61.8 · +28.3 Ural Federal District +28.3 Chelyabinsk Region · 2024: 90.1 green mass weight · 2023: 61.8 · +28.3 Chelyabinsk Region +28.3 Central Federal District · 2024: 76.4 green mass weight · 2023: 55.7 · +20.7 Central Federal District +20.7 Arkhangelsk Region · 2024: 94.7 green mass weight · 2023: 80.1 · +14.6 Arkhangelsk Region +14.6 Arkhangelsk Oblast (excluding Nenets Autonomous Okrug) · 2024: 94.7 green mass weight · 2023: 80.1 · +14.6 Arkhangelsk… Autonomous Okrug)Arkhangelsk Oblast (excluding Nenets Autonomous Okrug) +14.6 Moscow Region · 2024: 89.9 green mass weight · 2023: 80.0 · +9.88 Moscow Region +9.88 Siberian Federal District · 2024: 86.7 green mass weight · 2023: 91.3 · −4.65 Siberian Federal District −4.65 Krasnoyarsk Territory · 2024: 86.7 green mass weight · 2023: 91.3 · −4.65 Krasnoyarsk Territory −4.65 Rostov Region · 2024: 182.8 green mass weight · 2023: 195.0 · −12.3 Rostov Region −12.3 Russian Federation · 2024: 83.3 green mass weight · 2023: 102.5 · −19.2 Russian Federation −19.2 Northwestern Federal District · 2024: 67.8 green mass weight · 2023: 108.8 · −41.0 Northwestern Federal District −41.0 Leningrad Region · 2024: 160.0 green mass weight · 2023: 206.7 · −46.7 Leningrad Region −46.7 Republic of Karelia · 2024: 28.4 green mass weight · 2023: 78.0 · −49.6 Republic of Karelia −49.6 Vologda Region · 2024: 32.8 green mass weight · 2023: 96.1 · −63.3 Vologda Region −63.3
how it will look

Set in numbers

25 series are published here in green mass weight, from 2023 to 2024, 2 reporting periods. 42 values in total.

Between 2023 and 2024 “Russian Federation” declined from 102 to 83.3 — 18.7%.

All table numbers are series: 25

How to read this table

The rows allow for comparing national-scale results with those of a specific federal district or region. For example, Russian Federation averages can be compared with Kursk Region data to observe differences in grass harvesting. This approach helps assess operations in large agricultural organizations (excluding small businesses) across different territorial levels

What is visible in these numbers

The largest value belongs to “Volga Federal District” — 194 green mass weight; the smallest is “Republic of Karelia” at 28.4 green mass weight. The gap between them is 6.8-fold.

The table is 84% filled: Rosstat does not publish every cell, and the gaps are left as they are rather than interpolated.

The same indicator for other periods

More in the section Bulletins on the state of agriculture (electronic versions)»

Period and application

Data is published annually in Rosstat's agricultural bulletins. Information is updated upon completion of data collection for the reporting year. These figures are useful for agricultural specialists, farm managers, and users analyzing the status and dynamics of forage production at national and regional levels for planning purposes