Roschart — Russian statistics in charts

Official Rosstat statistics turned into charts instead of CSV and XLSX

RU

Share of production of agricultural crops in farms of various organisational and legal forms Sugar beet

· snapshot · rows: 30 · periods: 5 · section: Bulletins on the state of agriculture (electronic versions)

The share of crop production shows the proportion of farms of a specific legal form in the total output of a product. This table provides a breakdown for sugar beet, reflecting the structure of producers by ownership and management forms: from all farm categories to peasant (farmer) farms and individual entrepreneurs

shown 25 largest of 30

Share of sugar beet production by legal farm forms in Russia and federal districts

Russian Federation 100.0 Central Federal District 100.0 Belgorod Region 100.0 Voronezh Region 100.0 Belgorod Region 100.0 Southern Federal District 100.0 Krasnodar Territory 100.0 Volga Federal District 100.0 Republic of Mordovia 100.0 Republic of Tatarstan (Tatarstan) 100.0 Chuvash Republic - Chuvashia 100.0 Nizhny Novgorod Region 100.0 Kursk Region 100.0 Oryol Region 100.0 Tambov Region 100.0 Tula Region 100.0 Rostov Region 100.0 North Caucasian Federal District 100.0 Karachay-Cherkess Republic 100.0 Stavropol Territory 100.0 Republic of Bashkortostan 100.0 Penza Oblast 100.0 Saratov Region 100.0 Ulyanovsk Region 100.0 Bryansk Region 100.0
how it will look

Set in numbers

30 series, arranged across 5 breakdowns rather than over time. 124 values in total.

The largest value belongs to “Chuvash Republic - Chuvashia” — 68; the smallest is “Oryol Region” at 0.08. The gap between them is 848-fold.

All table numbers are series: 30
Series Хозяйства всех категорийСельскохозяйственные организациииз них: малые предприятияХозяйства населенияКрестьянские (фермерские) хозяйства и индивидуальные предприниматели
Российская Федерация 100,00 89,47 11,46 0,04 10,49
Центральный федеральный округ 100,00 93,16 7,63 0,06 6,78
Белгородская область 100,00 93,73 1,45 0,05 6,21
Брянская область 100,00 87,52 — — 12,48
Воронежская область 100,00 91,89 6,98 0,25 7,87
Курская область 100,00 93,49 7,50 — 6,51
Липецкая область 100,00 90,47 3,06 0,00 9,53
Орловская область 100,00 99,92 7,42 — 0,08
Рязанская область 100,00 100,00 62,47 — —
Тамбовская область 100,00 92,95 9,65 — 7,05
Тульская область 100,00 97,76 42,30 — 2,24
Южный федеральный округ 100,00 81,22 9,96 0,00 18,78
Республика Адыгея (Адыгея) 100,00 100,00 100,00 — —
Краснодарский край 100,00 82,28 9,40 0,00 17,72
Ростовская область 100,00 55,73 15,22 — 44,27
Северо-Кавказский федеральный округ 100,00 86,81 15,66 — 13,19
Карачаево-Черкесская Республика 100,00 72,02 65,71 — 27,98
Ставропольский край 100,00 88,93 8,48 — 11,07
Приволжский федеральный округ 100,00 84,48 23,54 0,01 15,51
Республика Башкортостан 100,00 89,94 48,93 — 10,06
Республика Мордовия 100,00 94,19 20,41 0,05 5,76
Республика Татарстан (Татарстан) 100,00 86,01 16,11 0,03 13,97
Чувашская Республика - Чувашия 100,00 31,66 31,66 0,34 68,00
Нижегородская область 100,00 85,79 3,03 0,00 14,21
Оренбургская область 100,00 100,00 100,00 — —
Пензенская область 100,00 82,94 9,04 — 17,06
Саратовская область 100,00 72,86 39,04 — 27,14
Ульяновская область 100,00 57,80 43,93 — 42,20
Сибирский федеральный округ 100,00 100,00 — — —
Алтайский край 100,00 100,00 — — —

How to read this table

Data vary by legal forms: 'All farm categories' include all agricultural enterprises and personal subsidiary farms, while 'Peasant (farmer) farms and individual entrepreneurs' highlight small businesses. Comparing rows reveals how the role of farmers varies across regions and the extent of production concentration in large farms

What is visible in these numbers

The table is 89% filled: Rosstat does not publish every cell, and the gaps are left as they are rather than interpolated.

The same indicator in other breakdowns (2)

More in the section Bulletins on the state of agriculture (electronic versions)»

Period and application

The current-year data slice is updated annually. The materials will be useful for agricultural producers to assess the competitiveness of their farm structures and for officials to analyze industry development and develop farmer support measures