Dynamics of labour productivity in Russia and foreign countries
From 2010 to 2024, labor productivity in Russia and thirty other countries varied. Each row in the list corresponds to an individual country, allowing for a comparison of economic indicators across nations. The series include data for Austria, Belgium, Hungary, and other comparison countries, with values reflecting annual dynamics
Chart showing labor productivity dynamics in Russia and other countries from 2010 to 2024
- Ireland
- United Kingdom (Great Britain)
- Estonia
- Poland
- Lithuania
- Switzerland
- Hungary
- Belgium
- Denmark
- Italy
Set in numbers
Rosstat data for 2010–2024. Series: 31, periods: 8. Table rows: Austria; Belgium; Hungary; Germany; Greece and others
Ireland: indicator fell from 6.3 to 0.5 in 2010–2024 — by a factor of 12.6. Highest value — 21 (2015), lowest — -4.2 (2023). This averages 16.6% annual decline. Up to 2021 the change was +28.6%, after — −93.8%. Of the 25 largest series, 2 rose, 23 fell
All table numbers are series: 31
| Series | 2010 | 2015 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Россия | — | -1,40 | 2,40 | -0,50 | 3,90 | -2,90 | 2,40 | 3,40 |
| Австрия | 1,30 | 1,70 | -0,10 | 3,00 | -0,30 | 2,50 | -2,00 | 0,10 |
| Бельгия | 1,10 | 1,00 | 0,90 | 3,70 | -1,70 | -0,20 | 0,20 | 0,70 |
| Венгрия | 1,60 | 1,50 | 4,60 | 1,10 | 3,50 | 2,20 | 0,10 | 0,20 |
| Германия | 2,30 | 0,60 | 0,70 | 0,90 | 1,40 | -0,10 | -0,60 | -0,02 |
| Греция | -1,00 | 3,60 | 2,40 | 3,00 | -3,20 | 1,70 | 0,50 | 0,80 |
| Дания | 3,60 | 1,10 | 0,90 | 1,70 | 0,50 | -3,20 | 0,30 | 3,00 |
| Ирландия | 6,30 | 21,00 | 1,70 | 18,30 | 8,10 | -1,40 | -4,20 | 0,50 |
| Испания | 2,40 | 1,00 | 0,20 | 0,05 | -0,50 | 1,40 | 0,60 | 1,20 |
| Италия | 2,10 | 0,10 | 0,40 | 3,30 | -1,20 | 0,50 | -1,80 | -1,40 |
| Латвия | 4,10 | 4,30 | -1,30 | 2,80 | 6,50 | -0,40 | 3,00 | -0,20 |
| Литва | 4,40 | 0,04 | 4,00 | 6,10 | 3,50 | -2,60 | -2,00 | -0,20 |
| Нидерланды | 2,10 | 1,10 | -0,10 | 0,02 | 2,40 | 0,80 | -2,20 | 0,20 |
| Норвегия | 0,50 | 1,30 | -0,40 | 0,90 | 1,60 | -0,20 | -0,50 | 1,80 |
| Польша | 6,30 | 2,50 | 1,60 | -1,30 | 1,20 | 4,60 | 0,80 | 4,90 |
| Португалия | 3,10 | -0,30 | 1,60 | 0,00 | 1,00 | 0,80 | 0,70 | 1,40 |
| Словакия | 7,10 | 3,80 | 1,90 | 6,90 | 5,80 | -3,30 | 0,60 | 2,50 |
| Словения | 3,20 | 0,70 | 1,10 | 0,90 | 2,90 | -1,20 | 1,90 | 0,50 |
| Соединенное Королевство (Великобритания) | 2,00 | 0,70 | 0,90 | 13,40 | -11,80 | 2,20 | -0,20 | -0,70 |
| Финляндия | 3,60 | 0,20 | 0,50 | 0,40 | 0,50 | -1,70 | -0,80 | 0,70 |
| Франция | 1,40 | 0,80 | 0,50 | 0,20 | -1,40 | -1,50 | 0,00 | 0,02 |
| Чехия | 2,70 | 4,80 | 3,70 | 3,30 | 0,10 | -1,50 | -1,70 | -0,60 |
| Швейцария | 5,50 | -0,70 | 0,60 | 1,70 | 2,60 | 1,30 | -1,10 | 1,20 |
| Швеция | 3,30 | 2,80 | 2,90 | 1,40 | 2,50 | -1,80 | -1,10 | 1,30 |
| Эстония | 5,30 | -0,60 | 3,20 | 3,30 | 7,80 | -2,90 | -6,30 | -0,80 |
| Израиль | 2,70 | 0,00 | 3,10 | 7,00 | 2,20 | -0,70 | -0,60 | 0,50 |
| Турция | 2,50 | 4,10 | 3,90 | 17,80 | -6,10 | — | — | — |
| Япония | 3,10 | 2,00 | 0,90 | -0,80 | 2,10 | 0,80 | 0,90 | — |
| Канада | 0,60 | -0,30 | 0,30 | 7,70 | -4,00 | -0,70 | -1,80 | -0,50 |
| Мексика | 3,40 | 0,00 | -2,60 | -0,90 | -2,40 | -0,60 | 1,50 | — |
| США | 2,60 | 0,80 | 1,40 | 4,60 | 1,40 | -1,10 | 1,60 | — |
How to read this table
Table rows are categorized by country to trace the individual development path of each economy. Comparing the indicators of Austria, Belgium, or Hungary with Russian values reveals differences in labor efficiency on a global scale. Annual series allow for assessing the impact of external factors on productivity during specific periods over the last fifteen years
What is visible in these numbers
Five highest values: Ireland (21), United Kingdom (Great Britain) (13.4), Estonia (7.8), Slovakia (7.1), Israel (7). Gap between highest and lowest — by a factor of 14. The top five account for 43% of the total across all items
Observations are annual and cover 8 periods. Cells with numbers: 200 out of 200 (100%) — gaps are virtually absent
The same indicator for other periods
These series cannot be stitched together Over the common period 2010 values diverge — Rosstat recalculated the indicator using a revised methodology. They cannot be combined into a single chart: a break would appear at the junction, which did not actually occur
| Indicator for 2010 | here | in the adjacent series | divergence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Австрия | 1,3 | 1,5 | +0,2 |
| Бельгия | 1,1 | 1,5 | +0,4 |
| Венгрия | 1,6 | 1,5 | −0,1 |
| Германия | 2,3 | 2,3 | +0,0 |
| Греция | -1,0 | -0,9 | +0,1 |
| Дания | 3,6 | 3,6 | +0,0 |
| Ирландия | 6,3 | 6,2 | −0,1 |
| Испания | 2,4 | 2,5 | +0,1 |
| Италия | 2,1 | 2,3 | +0,2 |
| Латвия | 4,1 | 3,3 | −0,8 |
| Литва | 4,4 | 5,7 | +1,3 |
| Нидерланды | 2,1 | 2,1 | +0,0 |
More in the section Russia and countries of the world»
Period and application
The indicators cover the period from 2010 to 2024 and are updated annually. Data on annual dynamics is useful for economists, labor market researchers, and macroeconomics specialists. Rosstat provides this information for analyzing global production efficiency trends
How it is calculated
Noted in the source itself: For foreign countries — change in GDP indicators at constant prices per hour worked (OECD estimates); for Russia — the ratio of the volume indices of GDP to the change in total hours worked…
1) По зарубежным странам – изменение показателей ВВП в постоянных ценах в расчете на один час отработанного времени (оценки ОЭСР), по России – частное от деления индексов физического объема ВВП на изменение совокупных затрат труда.
Did you notice an error in this table? The parser is wrong, and most often one correction fixes many pages
Report an error Typo is easier this way: highlight it and press Ctrl + Enter