220.4 million units in 2010 and 44.3 in 2022 - this is how land indicators in Russia changed according to statistics. The table series cover Russia, Austria, Belarus, and other countries, allowing for a comparison of their land funds for the period from 2010 to 2022. The rows present various categories of agricultural land, and the information is grouped to clearly show the distribution of areas between arable land and other types of land in different countries
Dynamics of the composition of agricultural land in Russia for the period from 2010 to 2022
Rosstat data for 2010–2022. Rows: 198, periods: 2. Breakdown: Russia — value; Russia — arable land; Russia — other agricultural land; Austria — value; Austria — arable land and other
Russia — value: the indicator grew from 220.4 to 225.5 over 2010–2022 — by 2.31%. Of the 21 largest rows, 6 increased, 15 decreased
The differences between rows are based on the geographical affiliation of the land to a specific country. Values can be compared both within a single country by year and between countries in a single time slice. This structure helps identify changes in land resource use over twelve years. The table contains 66 rows reflecting data for Russia and other countries, making it possible to assess the scale of land use in an international context and track the dynamics of changes for each individual territory
What is visible in these numbers
Five highest values: Russia — value (225.5), Hungary — arable land (82), Germany — arable land (71), Belarus — arable land (69), Bulgaria — arable land (69). The gap between the highest and lowest is 161.1 times. The top five account for 46.9% of the total across all positions
Observations are annual, the dataset contains 2 periods. Of 50 possible values, 50 (100%) are filled — almost no empty cells remain
These series cannot be stitched together Over the common period
2010 values diverge — Rosstat recalculated the indicator using a revised methodology. They cannot be combined into a single chart: a break would appear at the junction, which did not actually occur
Indicator for 2010
here
in the adjacent series
divergence
Россия — значение
220,4
220,4
+0,0
Россия — пашня
55,1
55,1
+0,0
Россия — прочие сельскохозяйственные угодья
44,9
44,9
+0,0
Австрия — значение
2,8
2,8
+0,0
Австрия — пашня
49,0
49,0
+0,0
Австрия — прочие сельскохозяйственные угодья
51,0
51,0
+0,0
Беларусь — значение
8,9
8,9
+0,0
Беларусь — пашня
62,0
62,0
+0,0
Беларусь — прочие сельскохозяйственные угодья
38,0
38,0
+0,0
Бельгия — значение
1,4
1,4
+0,0
Бельгия — пашня
62,0
62,0
+0,0
Бельгия — прочие сельскохозяйственные угодья
38,0
38,0
+0,0
More in the section Russia and countries of the world»
The 'Russia and Countries of the World 2024' collection includes this information, which is updated as reports are received. The statistics are useful for agronomists, geographers, and economists dealing with land use issues. All indicators cover the period from 2010 to 2022, providing an opportunity to analyze long-term trends in the agriculture of various countries. The data is presented in a convenient tabular format for a detailed study of the structure of agricultural land
How it is calculated
Noted in the source itself: As of year-end. According to Rosreestr; for 2023 (as of 1 January 2024) including data for the Donetsk People’s Republic and the Luhansk People’s Republic
1) На конец года.
2) По данным Росреестра; за 2023 г. (на 1 января 2024 г.) с учетом информации по Донецкой Народной Республике, Луганской Народной Республике.
3) 2019 г.
Did you notice an error in this table? The parser is wrong, and most often one correction fixes many pages
Report an errorTypo is easier this way: highlight it and press
Ctrl + Enter