Production of livestock and poultry for slaughter in carcass weight in the Far North regions
This dataset contains data on livestock and poultry production for slaughter in Far North districts in 2021 and 2022. The rows are categorized by territory, including the total for the Russian Federation, the North-Western Federal District, and the Republic of Karelia. The two-year data coverage allows for a comparison of production indicators
Livestock and poultry production for slaughter by Far North districts in 2021 and 2022
Set in numbers
33 series, arranged across 6 breakdowns rather than over time. 192 values in total.
“Republic of Tyva” leads the table with 136, “Krasnoyarsk Territory” closes it with 49.3.
All table numbers are series: 33
| Series | 2021 | 2022 | 2022 | 2021 | 2022 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| строка 1 | — | — | 2 021,00 | — | — | 2 021,00 |
| Российская федерация | 42 672,00 | 41 715,00 | 97,80 | 20 916,00 | 19 206,00 | 91,80 |
| Северо-западный федеральный округ | 2 815,00 | 2 797,00 | 99,40 | 1 230,00 | 1 193,00 | 96,90 |
| Республика Карелия | 726,00 | 758,00 | 104,50 | 125,00 | 131,00 | 105,00 |
| Республика Коми | 1 062,00 | 1 058,00 | 99,60 | 495,00 | 488,00 | 98,50 |
| Архангельская область | 966,00 | 919,00 | 95,20 | 513,00 | 475,00 | 92,50 |
| в т.ч.Ненецкий автономный округ | 57,00 | 55,00 | 96,10 | 222,00 | 211,00 | 94,80 |
| Архангельская область (без автономного округа) | 909,00 | 865,00 | 95,10 | 291,00 | 264,00 | 90,70 |
| Мурманская область | 61,00 | 61,00 | 100,60 | 97,00 | 99,00 | 101,80 |
| Приволжский федеральный округ | 464,00 | 404,00 | 87,00 | 54,00 | 43,00 | 79,50 |
| Пермский край | 464,00 | 404,00 | 87,00 | 54,00 | 43,00 | 79,50 |
| Уральский федеральный округ | 3 896,00 | 3 909,00 | 100,30 | 6 513,00 | 3 712,00 | 57,00 |
| Тюменская область | 3 896,00 | 3 909,00 | 100,30 | 6 513,00 | 3 712,00 | 57,00 |
| в т.ч.Ханты-Мансийский автономный округ-Югра | 842,00 | 820,00 | 97,40 | 6 193,00 | 3 367,00 | 54,40 |
| Ямало-Ненецкий автономный округ | 2 944,00 | 2 956,00 | 100,40 | 313,00 | 338,00 | 108,00 |
| Тюменская область(без автономных округов) | 110,00 | 132,00 | 120,50 | 7,00 | 7,00 | 104,70 |
| Сибирский федеральный округ | 16 437,00 | 16 108,00 | 98,00 | 4 987,00 | 6 041,00 | 121,10 |
| Республика Алтай | 2 385,00 | 2 535,00 | 106,30 | 1 043,00 | 1 204,00 | 115,40 |
| Республика Тыва | 7 669,00 | 7 653,00 | 99,80 | 3 064,00 | 4 163,00 | 135,90 |
| Красноярский край | 1 474,00 | 1 232,00 | 83,60 | 148,00 | 73,00 | 49,30 |
| Иркутская область | 1 536,00 | 1 521,00 | 99,10 | 349,00 | 289,00 | 83,00 |
| Томская область | 3 373,00 | 3 166,00 | 93,90 | 383,00 | 312,00 | 81,40 |
| Дальневосточный федеральный округ | 19 060,00 | 18 497,00 | 97,00 | 8 132,00 | 8 217,00 | 101,00 |
| Республика Бурятия | 2 599,00 | 2 410,00 | 92,70 | 268,00 | 358,00 | 133,60 |
| Республика Саха(Якутия) | 10 333,00 | 10 874,00 | 105,20 | 6 742,00 | 6 738,00 | 99,90 |
| Забайкальский край | 299,00 | 258,00 | 86,30 | — | — | 3,90 |
| Камчатский край | 773,00 | 776,00 | 100,40 | 213,00 | 224,00 | 105,10 |
| Приморский край | 518,00 | 474,00 | 91,50 | 54,00 | 27,00 | 50,00 |
| Хабаровский край | 3 294,00 | 2 726,00 | 82,80 | 142,00 | 64,00 | 44,90 |
| Амурская область | 596,00 | 367,00 | 61,50 | 52,00 | 10,00 | 19,10 |
| Магаданская область | 46,00 | 40,00 | 86,90 | 153,00 | 224,00 | 146,10 |
| Сахалинская область | 559,00 | 531,00 | 95,00 | 501,00 | 563,00 | 112,40 |
| Чукотский автономный округ | 43,00 | 41,00 | 95,60 | 6,00 | 9,00 | 157,10 |
How to read this table
The list contains 33 rows, allowing for a comparison of individual territories against national or federal district totals. The differences between rows help assess each region's contribution to total livestock and poultry production. Comparing 2021 and 2022 values shows changes in output volumes across these northern districts
The same indicator in other breakdowns (1)
More in the section Bulletins on the state of agriculture (electronic versions)»
Period and application
Data for 2021 and 2022 are provided in terms of slaughter weight. The statistics are useful for agro-industrial complex specialists, local government representatives, and those studying agricultural development in the country's northern regions
Did you notice an error in this table? The parser is wrong, and most often one correction fixes many pages
Report an error Typo is easier this way: highlight it and press Ctrl + Enter