Roschart — Russian statistics in charts

Official Rosstat statistics turned into charts instead of CSV and XLSX

RU

Rosstat data on the share of sown areas of long flax in farms

· snapshot · rows: 30 · periods: 5 · section: Bulletins on the state of agriculture (electronic versions)

The distribution of fiber flax sown areas by organizational and legal form enables an assessment of the role of large and small producers in the industry. Columns include data for all categories of farms, including peasant and farmer holdings, as well as individual entrepreneurs. Rows provide comparisons for Russia as a whole, federal districts, and individual constituent entities, such as the Ivanovo Region

shown 25 largest of 30

Distribution of fiber flax sown area shares by farm type and region, in percent

Russian Federation 100.0 Central Federal District 100.0 Ivanovo Region 100.0 Smolensk Region 100.0 Tver Region 100.0 Vologda Region 100.0 Pskov Region 100.0 Volga Federal District 100.0 Nizhny Novgorod Region 100.0 Siberian Federal District 100.0 Jewish Autonomous Region 100.0 Bryansk Region 100.0 Tula Region 100.0 Yaroslavl Region 100.0 Northwestern Federal District 100.0 Republic of Tatarstan (Tatarstan) 100.0 Udmurt Republic 100.0 Irkutsk Region 100.0 Far Eastern Federal District 100.0 Amur Region 100.0 Kostroma Region 100.0 Moscow 100.0 Southern Federal District 100.0 Rostov Region 100.0 Kirov Region 100.0
how it will look

Set in numbers

The table is a snapshot — 30 series shown across 5 breakdowns. 91 values in total.

“Tula Region” leads the table with 100, “Pskov Region” closes it with 2. The gap between them is 50.3-fold.

All table numbers are series: 30
Series Хозяйства всех категорийСельскохозяйственные организациииз них: малые предприятияХозяйства населенияКрестьянские (фермерские) хозяйства и индивидуальные предприниматели
Российская Федерация 100,00 64,70 33,23 — 35,30
Центральный федеральный округ 100,00 72,63 42,48 — 27,37
Брянская область 100,00 100,00 39,91 — —
Ивановская область 100,00 15,19 15,19 — 84,81
Костромская область 100,00 — — — 100,00
Смоленская область 100,00 67,35 28,30 — 32,65
Тверская область 100,00 68,89 51,26 — 31,11
Тульская область 100,00 100,00 100,00 — —
Ярославская область 100,00 100,00 98,49 — —
г. Москва 100,00 100,00 — — —
Северо-Западный федеральный округ 100,00 75,77 — — 24,23
Вологодская область 100,00 71,83 63,03 — 28,17
Псковская область 100,00 98,01 26,49 — 1,99
Южный федеральный округ 100,00 100,00 — — —
Ростовская область 100,00 100,00 — — —
Приволжский федеральный округ 100,00 69,21 28,35 — 30,79
Республика Татарстан (Татарстан) 100,00 99,15 43,94 — —
Удмуртская Республика 100,00 64,87 — — 35,13
Кировская область 100,00 100,00 — — —
Нижегородская область 100,00 54,93 41,59 — 45,07
Оренбургская область 100,00 — — — 100,00
Сибирский федеральный округ 100,00 34,87 5,87 — 65,13
Алтайский край 100,00 100,00 — — —
Иркутская область 100,00 100,00 100,00 — —
Новосибирская область 100,00 — — — 100,00
Омская область 100,00 0,14 — — —
Томская область 100,00 100,00 — — —
Дальневосточный федеральный округ 100,00 78,84 78,84 — —
Амурская область 100,00 100,00 100,00 — —
Еврейская автономная область 100,00 58,22 58,22 — 41,78

How to read this table

Comparing rows reveals variations in crop production structure across different parts of the country or specific regions. For example, the share of small farms in total fiber flax sowings may vary significantly by region. Column values reflect the percentage distribution of areas within each category, highlighting the specialization of various types of agricultural producers

What is visible in these numbers

Only 65% of the cells carry a value — empty cells are missing in the source publication and are not filled in here.

The same indicator in other breakdowns (2)

More in the section Bulletins on the state of agriculture (electronic versions)»

Period and application

Data are collected based on agricultural bulletins. As a snapshot without time-series dynamics, the data reflect the sowing structure at a specific point in time. This information is useful for agronomists, economists, and those analyzing the distribution of crop production resources by ownership form and territory