Installed capacity of wastewater treatment plants, 2016–2024
Wastewater treatment capacity in the Russian Arctic changed from 2016 to 2024, allowing for a comparison of indicators across the entire Arctic territory, as well as for the Murmansk Oblast and Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous Okrug. Rows vary by territorial coverage, facilitating comparisons between the total load on treatment systems and the capacity of specific constituent entities. Data is presented annually; the unit of measurement is not specified in the table
- Arctic Zone of the Russian Federation
- Arkhangelsk Region
- Arkhangelsk Oblast (excluding Nenets Autonomous Okrug)
- Murmansk Region
- Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous Okrug
Chart showing changes in wastewater treatment capacity in the Arctic zone, Murmansk Oblast, and YNAO from 2016 to 2024
Who grew, who fell: 2016 → 2024
Set in numbers
12 series are published here, from 2016 to 2024, 9 reporting periods. 103 values in total.
Between 2016 and 2024 “Arctic Zone of the Russian Federation” declined from 1,700 to 1,367 — 19.6%. The lowest value in the series is 1,238 in 2019.
All table numbers are series: 12
| Series | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Арктическая зона Российской Федерации | 1 699,99 | 1 468,61 | 1 279,24 | 1 237,50 | 1 357,25 | 1 372,09 | 1 370,13 | 1 384,92 | 1 366,95 |
| Мурманская область | 415,71 | 409,19 | 456,23 | 420,01 | 418,92 | 424,44 | 425,59 | 421,81 | 411,57 |
| Ямало-Ненецкий автономный округ | 411,10 | 176,60 | 185,20 | 176,10 | 176,77 | 178,27 | 178,27 | 178,27 | 178,27 |
| Чукотский автономный округ | — | — | — | — | 0,10 | 0,20 | 0,20 | 0,20 | 0,20 |
| Архангельская область | 584,18 | 586,12 | 341,12 | 344,52 | 356,08 | 363,80 | 360,90 | 361,50 | 355,42 |
| Ненецкий автономный округ | 4,40 | 5,24 | 5,24 | 5,24 | 5,24 | 5,24 | 5,24 | 5,24 | 5,24 |
| Архангельская область (кроме Ненецкого автономного округа) | 579,78 | 580,88 | 335,88 | 339,28 | 350,84 | 358,56 | 355,66 | 356,26 | 350,18 |
| Республика Коми | 90,10 | 90,10 | 90,10 | 90,10 | 143,40 | 143,40 | 142,80 | 142,80 | 142,80 |
| Республика Карелия | — | 5,20 | 5,20 | 5,16 | 59,07 | 59,07 | 59,07 | 59,07 | 59,07 |
| Красноярский край | 185,90 | 188,40 | 188,40 | 185,85 | 187,15 | 187,15 | 187,15 | 205,46 | 203,81 |
| Республика Саха (Якутия) | 13,00 | 13,00 | 12,99 | 15,76 | 15,76 | 15,76 | 16,15 | 15,81 | 15,81 |
| Справочно: Российская Федерация - | 56 035,36 | 55 874,37 | 56 017,71 | 55 825,60 | 55 518,73 | 55 611,41 | 55 356,81 | 56 358,70 | 56 100,42 |
How to read this table
Differences between the rows show the share of the Murmansk Oblast and YNAO in the total capacity of the Arctic zone. Comparing these indicators reveals which regions provide the majority of wastewater treatment capacity in northern latitudes. The table contains twelve rows reflecting dynamics over the specified period, helping to track changes in water and wastewater treatment infrastructure
What is visible in these numbers
The largest value belongs to “Reference: Russian Federation —” — 56,100; the smallest is “Chukotka Autonomous Okrug” at 0.2. The gap between them is 280,502-fold.
The table is 95% filled: Rosstat does not publish every cell, and the gaps are left as they are rather than interpolated.
The same indicator in other breakdowns (5)
More in the section publications of official statistical information on socio-economic development»
Period and application
Statistical data is updated annually and covers the period from 2016 to 2024. This information on treatment systems is intended for ecologists, utility service providers, infrastructure management specialists, and those involved in the development of northern territories
Установленная пропускная способность очистных сооружений - отражается установленная пропускная способность очистных сооружений. Она равна количеству сточной жидкости, которую эти сооружения могут пропустить за сутки при полной загрузке всего комплекса очистных сооружений и соблюдении установленных требований к очистке сточной жидкости.
Did you notice an error in this table? The parser is wrong, and most often one correction fixes many pages
Report an error Typo is easier this way: highlight it and press Ctrl + Enter