Roschart — Russian statistics in charts

Official Rosstat statistics turned into charts instead of CSV and XLSX

RU

Installed capacity of wastewater treatment plants, 2016–2020

· snapshot · rows: 12 · periods: 6 · section: publications of official statistical information on socio-economic development

From 2016 to 2020, the installed capacity of treatment facilities in the Arctic zone of the Russian Federation changed from 1699.99 to 1357.25 units. The table provides data across twelve rows, breaking down indicators by individual constituent entities, such as Murmansk Oblast and Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous Okrug. This information enables an assessment of the infrastructure potential of treatment systems in each northern territory region over a five-year observation period

Chart of installed treatment plant capacity in the Arctic zone, 2016–2020

2016 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Arctic Zone of the Russian Federa…Arctic Zone of the Russian Federation Arctic Zone of the Russian Federation / 2016: 1,700 Arctic Zone of the Russian Federation / 2017: 1,469 Arctic Zone of the Russian Federation / 2018: 1,279 Arctic Zone of the Russian Federation / 2019: 1,238 Arctic Zone of the Russian Federation / 2020: 1,357 Murmansk Region Murmansk Region / 2016: 415.7 Murmansk Region / 2017: 409.2 Murmansk Region / 2018: 456.2 Murmansk Region / 2019: 420.0 Murmansk Region / 2020: 418.9 Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous Okrug Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous Okrug / 2016: 411.1 Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous Okrug / 2017: 176.6 Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous Okrug / 2018: 185.2 Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous Okrug / 2019: 176.1 Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous Okrug / 2020: 176.8 Chukotka Autonomous Okrug Chukotka Autonomous Okrug / 2020: 0.10 Arkhangelsk Region Arkhangelsk Region / 2016: 584.2 Arkhangelsk Region / 2017: 586.1 Arkhangelsk Region / 2018: 341.1 Arkhangelsk Region / 2019: 344.5 Arkhangelsk Region / 2020: 356.1 Nenets Autonomous Okrug Nenets Autonomous Okrug / 2016: 4.40 Nenets Autonomous Okrug / 2017: 5.24 Nenets Autonomous Okrug / 2018: 5.24 Nenets Autonomous Okrug / 2019: 5.24 Nenets Autonomous Okrug / 2020: 5.24 Arkhangelsk Oblast (excluding Nen…Arkhangelsk Oblast (excluding Nenets Autonomous Okrug) Arkhangelsk Oblast (excluding Nenets Autonomous Okrug) / 2016: 579.8 Arkhangelsk Oblast (excluding Nenets Autonomous Okrug) / 2017: 580.9 Arkhangelsk Oblast (excluding Nenets Autonomous Okrug) / 2018: 335.9 Arkhangelsk Oblast (excluding Nenets Autonomous Okrug) / 2019: 339.3 Arkhangelsk Oblast (excluding Nenets Autonomous Okrug) / 2020: 350.8 Republic of Komi Republic of Komi / 2016: 90.1 Republic of Komi / 2017: 90.1 Republic of Komi / 2018: 90.1 Republic of Komi / 2019: 90.1 Republic of Komi / 2020: 143.4 Republic of Karelia Republic of Karelia / 2017: 5.20 Republic of Karelia / 2018: 5.20 Republic of Karelia / 2019: 5.16 Republic of Karelia / 2020: 59.1 Krasnoyarsk Territory Krasnoyarsk Territory / 2016: 185.9 Krasnoyarsk Territory / 2017: 188.4 Krasnoyarsk Territory / 2018: 188.4 Krasnoyarsk Territory / 2019: 185.9 Krasnoyarsk Territory / 2020: 187.2 Republic of Sakha (Yakutia) Republic of Sakha (Yakutia) / 2016: 13.0 Republic of Sakha (Yakutia) / 2017: 13.0 Republic of Sakha (Yakutia) / 2018: 13.0 Republic of Sakha (Yakutia) / 2019: 15.8 Republic of Sakha (Yakutia) / 2020: 15.8 Reference: Russian Federation — Reference: Russian Federation — / 2016: 56,035 Reference: Russian Federation — / 2017: 55,874 Reference: Russian Federation — / 2018: 56,018 Reference: Russian Federation — / 2019: 55,826 Reference: Russian Federation — / 2020: 55,518
how it will look

Set in numbers

The table is a snapshot — 12 series shown across 6 breakdowns. 55 values in total.

The largest value belongs to “Reference: Russian Federation —” — 55,518; the smallest is “Chukotka Autonomous Okrug” at 0.1. The gap between them is 555,182-fold.

All table numbers are series: 12
Series 201620162017201820192020
Арктическая зона Российской Федерации 1 699,99 — 1 468,61 1 279,24 1 237,50 1 357,25
Мурманская область 415,71 — 409,19 456,23 420,01 418,92
Ямало-Ненецкий автономный округ 411,10 — 176,60 185,20 176,10 176,77
Чукотский автономный округ — — — — — 0,10
Архангельская область 584,18 — 586,12 341,12 344,52 356,08
Ненецкий автономный округ 4,40 — 5,24 5,24 5,24 5,24
Архангельская область (кроме Ненецкого автономного округа) 579,78 — 580,88 335,88 339,28 350,84
Республика Коми 90,10 — 90,10 90,10 90,10 143,40
Республика Карелия — — 5,20 5,20 5,16 59,07
Красноярский край 185,90 — 188,40 188,40 185,85 187,15
Республика Саха (Якутия) 13,00 — 13,00 12,99 15,76 15,76
Справочно: Российская Федерация - 56 035,36 — 55 874,37 56 017,71 55 825,60 55 518,21

How to read this table

Individual regions of the Arctic zone are presented in each row, facilitating a comparison of current wastewater treatment capacity between them. Columns contain annual indicators, showing the distribution of load and facility capacity within a specific constituent entity over five years. Comparing these data demonstrates differences in infrastructure provision across territories and how the capacity of treatment systems changed in each of the presented regions from 2016 to 2020

What is visible in these numbers

The table is 76% filled: Rosstat does not publish every cell, and the gaps are left as they are rather than interpolated.

The same indicator in other breakdowns (5)

More in the section publications of official statistical information on socio-economic development»

Period and application

Statistics are updated by Rosstat as part of publications on the socio-economic development of northern territories. This data is intended for environmental specialists, infrastructure designers, and researchers studying the state of public utilities in the Arctic. The information covers the period from 2016 to 2020 and reflects the status of treatment capacities by constituent entities of the Arctic zone of the Russian Federation

Установленная пропускная способность очистных сооружений - отражается установленная пропускная способность очистных сооружений. Она равна количеству сточной жидкости, которую эти сооружения могут пропустить за сутки при полной загрузке всего комплекса очистных сооружений и соблюдении установленных требований к очистке сточной жидкости.