Agricultural organizations not classified as small business entities harvested crops, the indicators for which are recorded in this table for 2022 and 2023. Rows are categorized by grape variety and type, as well as by federal district, allowing for a comparison of vineyard productivity across different regions of the country. Data is presented for the Russian Federation as a whole and by individual federal districts; note that the specific unit of measurement is not specified in the source, which should be considered when analyzing the values
Chart of vineyard yield by variety and type in agricultural organizations for 2022–2023
The breakdown of data into 17 rows allows for observing the difference in yield between the Southern and North Caucasian federal districts, as well as evaluating national totals for the two-year period. Comparing rows helps illustrate how vineyard productivity changed based on variety and crop type. The table reflects the performance of large-scale agricultural producers, providing a precise overview of this agro-industrial sector by excluding smallholder farms
What is visible in these numbers
The largest value belongs to “Krasnodar Territory — table varieties” — 130; the smallest is “Volga Federal District – table varieties” at 0.067. The gap between them is 1,954-fold.
The table is 80% filled: Rosstat does not publish every cell, and the gaps are left as they are rather than interpolated.
The presented data covers the 2022–2023 period. Information is updated by Rosstat through agricultural status bulletins. These statistics are useful for agronomists, food market analysts, and specialists studying the development of viticulture in Russia and harvest dynamics among large-scale industry enterprises
Did you notice an error in this table? The parser is wrong, and most often one correction fixes many pages
Report an errorTypo is easier this way: highlight it and press
Ctrl + Enter