1844648 residents of the Republic of Crimea reported language proficiency in the 2020 All‑Russian Population Census. This statistical snapshot shows which languages people know and which they use in everyday communication. The table has 147 rows, each devoted to a separate language or language group, allowing the region’s linguistic diversity to be seen. Data are split between urban and rural populations to assess how actively different languages are spread in these settlement types
Table of language proficiency and language use by the population of the Republic of Crimea according to the 2020 All‑Russian Population Census
Rosstat data. Rows: 147, indicators: 6. Breakdown by: Persons who indicated language proficiency; Languages of proficiency indicated by the population; Abazin; Abkhaz; Avar and others
Five highest values: Languages of proficiency indicated by the population (2.3 million), Persons who indicated language proficiency (1.8 million), English (68 456), Armenian (3 857), Belarusian (2 152). The gap between the highest and lowest is 578 294 times. The top five account for 99.9% of the total across all positions — the distribution is heavily skewed towards the top
All table numbers are series: 147
Series
Городское и сельское население — Численность лиц, владеющих соответствующим языком
Городское и сельское население — из них используют его в повседневной жизни
Городское население — Численность лиц, владеющих соответствующим языком
Городское население — из них используют его в повседневной жизни
Сельское население — Численность лиц, владеющих соответствующим языком
Сельское население — из них используют его в повседневной жизни
Each row represents a separate language, from Abaza to the aggregate categories of respondents who indicated language proficiency. One can compare the number of persons proficient in a specific language with the number who use it in daily life. Columns also show figures separately for urban and rural populations, revealing differences in language practice between city and countryside residents and allowing comparison of total speakers with active everyday users
What is visible in these numbers
The set includes the following indicators: Urban and rural population — Number of persons proficient in the correspond...; Urban and rural population — of them use it in everyday...; Urban population — Number of persons proficient in the corresponding langu...; Urban population — of them use it in everyday life; Rural population — Number of persons proficient in the corresponding language; Rural population — of them use it in everyday life
Cells with numbers 150 out of 150 (100%) — there are practically no gaps
More in the section Results of the All-Russian Population Census»
The information was obtained during the 2020 All‑Russian Population Census and is published in volume five of the results, dedicated to national composition and language proficiency. It is intended for linguists, sociologists and anyone studying the ethno‑cultural situation in the Republic of Crimea. The data are presented as a final snapshot without year‑by‑year dynamics, thus reflecting the linguistic picture at the time of the census. No updates are planned as the figures pertain to a completed statistical observation
How it is calculated
Census results on ethnic composition and languages are used in planning the school teaching of native languages, assessing the need for translation of public services, and in ethnographic research
Did you notice an error in this table? The parser is wrong, and most often one correction fixes many pages
Report an errorTypo is easier this way: highlight it and press
Ctrl + Enter