Languages identified by indigenous small-numbered peoples of Arkhangelsk Region
According to the 2020 Census, this data shows the languages spoken by indigenous small-numbered peoples in the Arkhangelsk Region (excluding the autonomous okrug). Rows list various population groups, while columns specify individual languages, ranging from Abazin to Evenki. As this is a one-time snapshot, year-on-year comparisons are not possible, but the distribution of language preferences within groups can be observed
Distribution of languages among indigenous small-numbered peoples in the Arkhangelsk Region, based on 2020 Census data
Set in numbers
13 series, arranged across 18 breakdowns rather than over time. 48 values in total.
“Nenets” leads the table with 14, “Finnish” closes it with 1. The gap between them is 14-fold.
All table numbers are series: 13
| Series | Абазины | Вепсы | Ижорцы | Камчадалы | Коряки | Кумандинцы | Нагайбаки | Нанайцы | Ненцы | Саамы | Селькупы | Удэгейцы | Ханты | Челканцы | Чуванцы | Чукчи | Шорцы | Эвенки |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Указанные населением языки | 4,00 | 30,00 | 3,00 | 1,00 | 1,00 | 1,00 | 1,00 | 5,00 | 343,00 | 2,00 | 3,00 | 1,00 | 14,00 | 2,00 | 1,00 | 3,00 | 1,00 | 2,00 |
| Абазинский | 2,00 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Алтайский | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1,00 | — | — | — | — |
| Английский | — | 5,00 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2,00 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Вепсский | — | 1,00 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Карельский | — | 1,00 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Китайский | — | 1,00 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Коми | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3,00 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Немецкий | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1,00 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Ненецкий | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 14,00 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Русский | 2,00 | 21,00 | 3,00 | 1,00 | 1,00 | 1,00 | 1,00 | 5,00 | 323,00 | 2,00 | 2,00 | 1,00 | 14,00 | 1,00 | 1,00 | 3,00 | 1,00 | 2,00 |
| Селькупский | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1,00 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Финский | — | 1,00 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
How to read this table
The rows in this dataset categorize languages into three groups: those directly reported by the population, plus Russian and English. This enables comparison between native language proficiency and the level of state and foreign language knowledge across different ethnic groups. Data can be compared via columns, which record language proficiency for each ethnic group
What is visible in these numbers
Only 21% of the cells carry a value — empty cells are missing in the source publication and are not filled in here.
More in the section Results of the All-Russian Population Census»
Period and application
The data is sourced from Volume 5 of the 2020 All-Russian Population Census results, which focuses on national composition. This information is relevant for ethnographers, demographers, and those studying the linguistic situation in Russia's regions. No updates are planned for this specific table, as it reflects the results of a one-time state census
* Oтдельные респонденты указали принадлежность более чем к одному коренному малочисленному народу
Did you notice an error in this table? The parser is wrong, and most often one correction fixes many pages
Report an error Typo is easier this way: highlight it and press Ctrl + Enter