How many residents of Arkhangelsk Region speak the languages of indigenous
The number of people proficient in the languages of indigenous small-numbered peoples is recorded in this statistic based on the 2020 All-Russian Population Census results for the Arkhangelsk Region, excluding the autonomous okrug. The twenty table rows list various languages, from Abazin to Evenki, allowing for an assessment of their prevalence among the local population. The data is presented as a cross-section without time periods, covering a wide range of language groups, including proficiency in Russian and English
Table of indigenous small-numbered peoples' language proficiency in the Arkhangelsk Region, according to 2020 Census data
Set in numbers
The table is a snapshot — 20 series shown across 18 breakdowns. 56 values in total.
The largest value belongs to “Nenets” — 42; the smallest is “Other languages (not listed above)” at 1. The gap between them is 42-fold.
All table numbers are series: 20
| Series | Абазины | Вепсы | Ижорцы | Камчадалы | Коряки | Кумандинцы | Нагайбаки | Нанайцы | Ненцы | Саамы | Селькупы | Удэгейцы | Ханты | Челканцы | Чуванцы | Чукчи | Шорцы | Эвенки |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Указанные населением языки | 4,00 | 35,00 | 4,00 | 1,00 | 1,00 | 1,00 | 1,00 | 5,00 | 396,00 | 2,00 | 3,00 | 1,00 | 18,00 | 2,00 | 1,00 | 3,00 | 1,00 | 3,00 |
| Абазинский | 2,00 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Азербайджанский | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1,00 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Алтайский | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1,00 | — | — | — | — |
| Английский | — | 6,00 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 19,00 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Вепсский | — | 2,00 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Карельский | — | 1,00 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Китайский | — | 1,00 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Коми | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 6,00 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Немецкий | — | 1,00 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3,00 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Ненецкий | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 42,00 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Норвежский | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1,00 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Русский | 2,00 | 21,00 | 3,00 | 1,00 | 1,00 | 1,00 | 1,00 | 5,00 | 323,00 | 2,00 | 2,00 | 1,00 | 14,00 | 1,00 | 1,00 | 3,00 | 1,00 | 2,00 |
| Селькупский | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1,00 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Финский | — | 2,00 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Хантыйский | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 4,00 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Цыганский | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1,00 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Эстонский | — | — | 1,00 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Якутский | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1,00 |
| Другие языки (не перечисленные выше) | — | 1,00 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
How to read this table
Rows are distinguished by a list of specific languages indicated by residents during the survey. The number of speakers for each language can be compared to identify the most and least common languages in the region. The extreme values in the series for languages specified by the population range from four people for Abazin to three people for Evenki, providing an indication of the scale of proficiency in these rare languages within the region
What is visible in these numbers
The table is 16% filled: Rosstat does not publish every cell, and the gaps are left as they are rather than interpolated.
More in the section Results of the All-Russian Population Census»
Period and application
The 2020 All-Russian Population Census serves as the basis for this data. The information is useful for linguists, ethnographers, and researchers of regional ethnic composition for analyzing linguistic diversity. Rosstat data is presented in Volume 5 of the census results, reflecting the current status of indigenous small-numbered peoples' language preservation in the Arkhangelsk Region
* Oтдельные респонденты указали принадлежность более чем к одному коренному малочисленному народу
Did you notice an error in this table? The parser is wrong, and most often one correction fixes many pages
Report an error Typo is easier this way: highlight it and press Ctrl + Enter