Proficiency in languages of indigenous small-numbered peoples of Russia in Khakassia
The 2020 Census results show the proficiency of residents in the Republic of Khakassia in the languages of indigenous small-numbered peoples. Rows list response options, such as Russian and English, while columns present specific languages ranging from Vepsian to Eskimo. This data reflects the situation at the time of the All-Russian Population Census, covering a wide range of ethnic groups
Table of proficiency in the languages of Russia's indigenous small-numbered peoples in the Republic of Khakassia
Set in numbers
The table is a snapshot — 21 series shown across 24 breakdowns. 73 values in total.
The largest value belongs to “Khakas” — 456; the smallest is “Persons whose language proficiency is not indicated in census records” at 1. The gap between them is 456-fold.
All table numbers are series: 21
| Series | Вепсы | Долганы | Ительмены | Камчадалы | Кеты | Коряки | Кумандинцы | Манси | Нагайбаки | Нганасаны | Ненцы | Нивхи | Селькупы | Сету (сето) | Телеуты | Тофалары | Тувинцы-тоджинцы | Удэгейцы | Ханты | Чукчи | Шорцы | Эвенки | Эвены (ламуты) | Эскимосы |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Указанные населением языки | 2,00 | 10,00 | 2,00 | 1,00 | 3,00 | 2,00 | 3,00 | 1,00 | 1,00 | 1,00 | 3,00 | 2,00 | 2,00 | 1,00 | 7,00 | 2,00 | 4,00 | 1,00 | 3,00 | 2,00 | 2 321,00 | 19,00 | 5,00 | 2,00 |
| Английский | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2,00 | — | 1,00 | — | — | — | 25,00 | — | 1,00 | — |
| Долганский | — | 3,00 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Китайский | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1,00 | — | — | — |
| Корейский | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1,00 | — | — | — |
| Немецкий | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1,00 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 14,00 | — | 1,00 | — |
| Ненецкий | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1,00 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Русский | 1,00 | 7,00 | 2,00 | 1,00 | 2,00 | 2,00 | 3,00 | 1,00 | 1,00 | 1,00 | 2,00 | 2,00 | 1,00 | 1,00 | 5,00 | 1,00 | 2,00 | 1,00 | 2,00 | 2,00 | 1 456,00 | 17,00 | 3,00 | 1,00 |
| Русский жестовый язык глухих | 1,00 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Тофаларский | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1,00 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Тувинский | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1,00 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Турецкий | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1,00 | — | — | — |
| Узбекский | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1,00 | — | — | — |
| Украинский | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2,00 | — | — | — |
| Хакасский | — | — | — | — | 1,00 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 456,00 | — | — | — |
| Хантыйский | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1,00 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Шорский | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 363,00 | — | — | — |
| Эвенкийский | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2,00 | — | — |
| Эскимосский | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1,00 |
| Другие языки (не перечисленные выше) | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1,00 | — | — | — |
| Лица, в переписных листах которых владение языками не указано | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1,00 | — | — | — |
How to read this table
The table rows categorize respondent answers into groups: the languages specified by the population, as well as Russian and English. The columns list specific indigenous small-numbered peoples' languages, allowing for a comparison of proficiency levels. Comparing rows illustrates the relationship between native language proficiency and proficiency in Russian or English among respondents in Khakassia
What is visible in these numbers
The table is 14% filled: Rosstat does not publish every cell, and the gaps are left as they are rather than interpolated.
More in the section Results of the All-Russian Population Census»
Period and application
The data is based on Volume 5 of the 2020 All-Russian Population Census results, which focuses on ethnic composition and languages. The information is presented as a cross-sectional snapshot without time-series data. This data is intended for linguists, ethnographers, and demographers studying the linguistic situation in Russia's regions
* Oтдельные респонденты указали принадлежность более чем к одному коренному малочисленному народу
Did you notice an error in this table? The parser is wrong, and most often one correction fixes many pages
Report an error Typo is easier this way: highlight it and press Ctrl + Enter