How families with and without children allocate disposable resources and expenditures
Families with children under sixteen and households without them have different income and expenditure structures. The list presents key resource items, including cash income and the value of in-kind transfers, which constitute the total base. The comparison is made between groups of families with and without children of the specified age, based on data for Q4 2022 and Q4 2023. Indicators are expressed as percentages, where the sum of all components in each category equals 100
Structure of household disposable resources and expenditures by presence of children, in percent
Set in numbers
The table is a snapshot — 28 series shown across 5 breakdowns. 112 values in total.
The largest value belongs to “Total available resources” — 100; the smallest is “value of services provided by the employer free of charge or at preferential prices” at 0.202. The gap between them is 495-fold.
All table numbers are series: 28
How to read this table
The rows in this list show the share of cash and in-kind assistance in the total volume of resources. Differences between columns show how the presence of children under sixteen affects the composition of disposable funds. The resource structure of families with children can be compared to those without them over two different periods. This helps to understand the differences in financial capacity between different types of households at the end of 2022 and 2023
What is visible in these numbers
The table is 80% filled: Rosstat does not publish every cell, and the gaps are left as they are rather than interpolated.
The same indicator in other breakdowns (4)
More in the section Distribution of surveyed households by place of residence»
Period and application
Statistics for Q4 2022 and 2023 reflect the current distribution of resources in households. The data is relevant for analyzing welfare levels and consumer demand planning. Rosstat data on the structure of resources and consumption expenditures is useful for sociologists, economists, and demographers
Did you notice an error in this table? The parser is wrong, and most often one correction fixes many pages
Report an error Typo is easier this way: highlight it and press Ctrl + Enter