Expenditure of hunting users on management
thousand rubles
In 2017, hunting users allocated funds for hunting management from various sources. The table provides amounts in thousands of rubles, with rows representing different territorial levels, from the entire Russian Federation to specific constituent entities and federal districts. Columns show the expenditure structure, broken down by financing method, including own funds and membership fees
Chart of total hunting management expenditures of hunting users by source of financing for 2017, thousands of rubles
Set in numbers
Rosstat data. Series: 84, indicators: 2. Unit of measurement — thousand rubles. Table rows: Russian Federation / 8549454.61), / 275947.3; Central Federal District / 3133901, / 136018; Belgorod Oblast / 126006.2 / -; Bryansk Oblast / 71283.6 / -; Vladimir Oblast / 235149.2 / - and others
Five largest values: Russian Federation / 8549454.61), / 275947.3 (6.2 million), Central Federal District / 3133901, / 13… (2.2 million), Tver Oblast / 738284.5 / 122036.9 (455 465), Northwestern Federal District / 686321.5 … (448 743), Tula Oblast / 358310.2 / - (332 741). The gap between the largest and smallest is 573.8 times. The top five account for 85.3% of the total for all positions — the distribution is heavily skewed toward the top
All table numbers are series: 84
How to read this table
The differences between rows allow for assessing the scale of expenditures at the national level and comparing them with indicators for individual regions or districts. Data should be compared by columns to determine the share of expenditures attributed to the hunting users' own funds versus membership fees. This helps illustrate the specifics of hunting management financing across different constituent entities during the reporting period
What is visible in these numbers
Dataset indicators: of which by sources of financing — own funds of hunting management…; of which by sources of financing — membership fees
Cells with numbers 50 out of 50 (100%) — there are practically no omissions
More in the section Bulletins on environmental protection (electronic versions)»
Period and application
The statistics were collected for 2017 and are presented by source of financing. This information is relevant for analyzing the financial burden on hunting users and assessing the volume of investment in natural resource management. Rosstat data covers 84 rows and is suitable for studying the structure of income and expenditure in the field of environmental protection
How it is calculated
The ecological load on the territory determines how difficult it will be to approve new production here
Rosstat stipulates: The sign (...) means that data are not published in order to ensure the confidentiality of primary statistical data received from respondents, in accordance with Federal Law No. 282-FZ of 29.11.2007 "On official…. Taking into account revised data for Lipetsk Oblast
Знак (...) означает, что данные не публикуются в целях обеспечения конфиденциальности первичных статистических данных, полученных от респондентов, в соответствии с Федеральным законом от 29.11.2007 г. No 282-ФЗ "Об официальном статистическом учете и системе государственной статистики в Российской Федерации" (ст.4, п.5; ст.9, п.1).
1) С учетом уточненных данных по Липецкой области.
2) С учетом уточненных данных по Каснодарскому краю.
Did you notice an error in this table? The parser is wrong, and most often one correction fixes many pages
Report an error Typo is easier this way: highlight it and press Ctrl + Enter