Housing affordability was assessed in percent for the whole of Russia and each of the 83 constituent entities in 2019 and 2020. The table contains 84 rows, each corresponding to a specific region or the country as a whole, showing regional differences in housing affordability. The indicator is expressed as a percentage; the data are annual and cover two consecutive years, allowing for year-on-year and intra-year comparisons
Chart of housing affordability levels by constituent entities of the RF for 2019 and 2020, in percent
Rosstat data for 2019–2020. Series: 84, period: 2. Breakdown by positions: Russian Federation; Belgorod Region; Bryansk Region; Vladimir Region; Voronezh Region and others
Nenets Autonomous Okrug: the indicator fell from 78.8 to 78.1 in 2019–2020 — by 0.89%. Of the 25 largest series, 24 increased, 1 decreased
Comparing indicators across different constituent entities highlights differences in living conditions across the country. Rows include both the total for the Russian Federation and data for individual regions, such as Belgorod or Bryansk Oblasts. This breakdown allows for assessment of how regional housing affordability compares to the national average
What is visible in these numbers
Five highest values: Nenets Autonomous Okrug (78.8), Bryansk Region (74.5), Tambov Region (74.3), Kostroma Region (71.8), Lipetsk Region (71.4). The top five account for 23.8% of the total for all positions
Observations are annual; total periods: 2. 50 of 50 possible values filled (100%) — almost no empty cells remain
More in the section Statistical yearbook "Sustainable Development Goals in the Russian Federation»
Statistics are published as part of the yearbook on sustainable development goals. Data cover 2019 and 2020 and are presented in percentages. This information is useful for real estate market researchers, urban planners, and those studying the socio-economic status of regions and quality of life
How it is calculated
Sustainable development indicators are used in preparing non-financial reporting, assessing social programmes and international comparisons
Did you notice an error in this table? The parser is wrong, and most often one correction fixes many pages
Report an errorTypo is easier this way: highlight it and press
Ctrl + Enter