Average number of employees of micro-enterprises by economic activity
persons
From 2011 to 2016, the average number of employees in micro-enterprises varied by business sector. The table presents data by various economic activities according to the OKVED classification, including agriculture, fishing, and other industries. The rows allow for comparison of which economic sectors have the highest concentration of workers, while the total number across all sectors for this period ranged from 4354510 to 5651109 people
- Section A Agriculture, hunting and forestry
- Division DJ Manufacture of basic metals and fabricated metal products
- Manufacture of fabricated metal products
- Manufacture of machinery and equipment (excluding manufacture of weapons and ammunition)
- Subsection DA manufacture of food products, including beverages, and of tobacco
- Division DE Manufacture of pulp, paper and paper products; publishing and printing
- Publishing and printing activities, duplication of recorded information carriers
- Division DL Manufacture of electrical equipment, electronic and optical products
- Division DI Manufacture of other non-metallic mineral products
- Subsection DD manufacture of wood and of products of wood and cork, except furniture
Chart of the average number of employees in micro-enterprises by industry from 2011 to 2016, people
Set in numbers
Rosstat data for 2011–2016. Rows: 46, periods: 5. Unit of measurement — persons. Breakdown: Total; Section A — Agriculture, hunting and forestry; Section B — Fishing, fish farming; Section C — Mining; Subsection CA — Extraction of fuel and energy minerals; and others
Total: the indicator increased from 4.4 million to 5.7 million over 2011–2016 — by 29.8%. The highest value — 5.7 million (2016), the lowest — 4.4 million (2011). This is an average annual growth of 5.35%. Of the 25 largest rows, 25 increased, 0 decreased
All table numbers are series: 46
How to read this table
Differences between rows are due to the classification of businesses into specific economic sectors, such as agriculture or fishing. Comparing these indicators allows for an assessment of the contribution of micro-enterprises to employment in each individual industry. The data reflect only the average number of personnel, not the total number of legal entities or individual entrepreneurs
What is visible in these numbers
Top five values: Total (5.7 million), Section D — Manufacturing (621,588), Section A — Agriculture, hunting and forestry (150,163), Subsection DJ — Metallurgical production and … (85,371), Manufacture of fabricated metal products (79,347). The gap between the highest and lowest is 5,185 times. The top five account for 91.6% of the total across all items — the distribution is heavily skewed toward the top
Observations are annual and cover 5 periods. Cells with numbers: 125 out of 125 (100%); data gaps are virtually absent
More in the section Institutional transformations in the economy»
Period and application
The statistics are based on sample survey results and cover the period from 2011 to 2016. The data are relevant for labor market specialists, economists, and small business representatives studying the employment structure in micro-organizations. The information helps to track the distribution of labor resources across different economic sectors during the specified years
How it is calculated
Indicators of the number and structure of organisations are used in assessing business activity, analysing industry competition and comparing regions by entrepreneurial climate
Rosstat notes: Based on data from a sample statistical observation according to Form No. MP(micro) "Key indicators of micro-enterprise activity". In years when a full-scale observation of small and medium-sized enterprises was conducted…
По данным выборочного статистического наблюдения по форме No МП(микро) "Основные показатели деятельности микропредприятия". В годы проведения сплошного наблюдения за деятельностью субъектов малого и среднего предпринимательства (2010, 2015) выборочное наблюдение не проводится.
Did you notice an error in this table? The parser is wrong, and most often one correction fixes many pages
Report an error Typo is easier this way: highlight it and press Ctrl + Enter