Roschart — Russian statistics in charts

Official Rosstat statistics turned into charts instead of CSV and XLSX

RU

Funds spent on eradication of pest foci in 2024

thousand rubles

· snapshot · rows: 35 · periods: 2 · section: Bulletins on environmental protection (electronic versions)

In 2024, funds were allocated for the control of harmful organism outbreaks, with amounts presented in thousands of rubles. The list contains 35 rows, ranging from indicators for the entire Russian Federation to data for federal districts and individual regions, such as the Moscow Region. The columns provide the total expenditure and a breakdown by component, allowing for an assessment of the expenditure structure for these activities

shown 25 largest of 35

Expenditure on harmful organism outbreak control activities for 2024, thousands of rubles

Russian Federation 233,313 Volga Federal District 78,040 Siberian Federal District 54,100 Far Eastern Federal District 51,885 Republic of Sakha (Yakutia) 51,885 Novosibirsk Oblast 30,375 Republic of Tatarstan 24,544 Central Federal District 22,231 Samara Region 22,188 Moscow Region 21,337 Southern Federal District 21,160 Ulyanovsk Region 13,498 Irkutsk Region 13,211 Altai Republic 9,975 Orenburg Region 6,520 Ural Federal District 4,451 Tyumen Oblast 1,998 Tyumen Region without autonomous districts 1,998 Kurgan Region 1,025 Ivanovo Region 822.0 Northwestern Federal District 120.0 Vologda Region 60.0 Chuvash Republic 52.0 Smolensk Region 52.0 Yaroslavl Region 20.0
how it will look

Set in numbers

The table is a snapshot — 35 series in thousand rubles shown across 2 breakdowns. 54 values in total.

The largest value belongs to “Russian Federation” — 211,618 thousand rubles; the smallest is “Yaroslavl Region” at 20 thousand rubles. The gap between them is 10,581-fold.

All table numbers are series: 35
Series Затраты на выполнение мероприятий по ликвидации очагов вредных организмов - всегоиз них:
Российская Федерация 233 312,80 211 618,10
Центральный федеральный округ 22 231,10 21 337,10
Ивановская область 822,00 —
Московская область 21 337,10 21 337,10
Смоленская область 52,00 —
Ярославская область 20,00 —
Северо-Западный федеральный округ 120,00 —
Вологодская область 60,00 —
Псковская область 60,00 —
Южный федеральный округ 21 159,50 15 272,30
Республика Адыгея 867,20 —
Волгоградская область — —
Северо-Кавказский федеральный округ 1 326,30 —
Кабардино-Балкарская Республика 565,10 —
Карачаево-Черкесская Республика 761,20 —
Приволжский федеральный округ 78 039,50 66 590,30
Республика Башкортостан 7 363,10 —
Республика Татарстан 24 544,40 24 544,40
Чувашская Республика 52,00 52,00
Кировская область 3 874,70 —
Оренбургская область 6 519,90 6 473,40
Самарская область 22 187,50 22 023,00
Ульяновская область 13 497,90 13 497,50
Уральский федеральный округ 4 451,40 3 022,40
Курганская область 1 024,50 1 024,50
Свердловская область 1 429,00 —
Тюменская область 1 997,90 1 997,90
Тюменская область без автономных округов 1 997,90 1 997,90
Сибирский федеральный округ 54 100,00 53 561,00
Республика Алтай 9 975,00 9 975,00
Иркутская область 13 211,00 13 211,00
Кемеровская область 539,00 —
Новосибирская область 30 375,00 30 375,00
Дальневосточный федеральный округ 51 885,00 51 835,00
Республика Саха (Якутия) 51 885,00 51 835,00

How to read this table

Rows differ by territorial coverage, ranging from the national level to specific federal districts and constituent entities. Indicators can be compared by the scale of allocated funding, taking into account the share of specific types of work within the total amount. This facilitates an understanding of how budget funds are distributed for harmful organism outbreak control across different parts of the country

What is visible in these numbers

The table is 90% filled: Rosstat does not publish every cell, and the gaps are left as they are rather than interpolated.

More in the section Bulletins on environmental protection (electronic versions)»

Period and application

Data is collected for a single reporting period: 2024. The data is presented as a snapshot without historical trends. This information is useful for ecologists, government officials, and environmental protection specialists to analyze the current state of funding for territorial protection