Roschart — Russian statistics in charts

Official Rosstat statistics turned into charts instead of CSV and XLSX

RU

Expenditure on measures to eliminate pest foci in 2023

thousand rubles

· snapshot · rows: 33 · periods: 2 · section: Bulletins on environmental protection (electronic versions)

326371 thousand rubles constituted the total expenditure on measures to control harmful organism outbreaks in the country for 2023. The series are broken down by territory, covering the Russian Federation, federal districts, and specific regions, such as Voronezh. The indicator is presented in thousands of rubles and divided into total amounts and separately allocated portions, providing insight into regional environmental security investments without a breakdown by period

shown 25 largest of 33

Table of expenditures on measures to control harmful organism outbreaks in 2023, thousands of rubles

Russian Federation 326,371 Volga Federal District 175,103 Siberian Federal District 97,789 Republic of Bashkortostan 87,108 Novosibirsk Oblast 69,915 Samara Region 51,596 Republic of Tatarstan 26,753 Irkutsk Region 25,687 Central Federal District 22,272 Southern Federal District 22,133 Moscow Region 18,505 Volgograd Region 18,454 Northwestern Federal District 5,115 Ulyanovsk Region 4,786 Ural Federal District 3,934 Voronezh Region 3,767 Orenburg Region 3,254 Vologda Region 2,676 Altai Territory 1,639 Republic of Komi 1,374 Kurgan Region 915.0 Chelyabinsk Region 843.0 Rostov Region 669.0 Krasnodar Territory 159.0 Chuvash Republic 20.0
how it will look

Set in numbers

The table is a snapshot — 33 series in thousand rubles shown across 2 breakdowns. 55 values in total.

The largest value belongs to “Russian Federation” — 309,346 thousand rubles; the smallest is “Chuvash Republic” at 20 thousand rubles. The gap between them is 15,467-fold.

All table numbers are series: 33
Series Затраты на выполнение мероприятий по ликвидации очагов вредных организмов - всегоиз них:
Российская Федерация 326 371,00 309 346,00
Центральный федеральный округ 22 272,00 22 272,00
Воронежская область 3 767,00 3 767,00
Московская область 18 505,00 18 505,00
Северо-Западный федеральный округ 5 115,00 —
Республика Коми 1 374,00 —
Вологодская область 2 676,00 —
Псковская область 1 065,00 —
Южный федеральный округ 22 133,00 14 596,00
Республика Адыгея 2 851,00 —
Краснодарский край 159,00 159,00
Волгоградская область 18 454,00 13 768,00
Ростовская область 669,00 669,00
Приволжский федеральный округ 175 103,00 173 479,00
Республика Башкортостан 87 108,00 87 108,00
Республика Татарстан 26 753,00 26 753,00
Чувашская Республика 20,00 20,00
Кировская область 1 586,00 —
Оренбургская область 3 254,00 3 233,00
Самарская область 51 596,00 51 579,00
Ульяновская область 4 786,00 4 786,00
Уральский федеральный округ 3 934,00 1 758,00
Курганская область 915,00 915,00
Свердловская область 2 176,00 —
Челябинская область 843,00 843,00
Сибирский федеральный округ 97 789,00 97 241,00
Алтайский край 1 639,00 1 639,00
Иркутская область 25 687,00 25 687,00
Кемеровская область 483,00 —
Новосибирская область 69 915,00 69 915,00
Томская область 65,00 —
Дальневосточный федеральный округ 25,00 —
Республика Саха (Якутия) 25,00 —

How to read this table

Rows contain data by constituent entities and districts, allowing for a comparison of pest control expenditures across different parts of the country. Both total funding volumes and detailed expenditure items presented in separate columns can be compared. These figures show the resources allocated to the preservation of forest and agricultural lands in each instance, highlighting differences in fund distribution among regions with varying environmental loads

What is visible in these numbers

The table is 94% filled: Rosstat does not publish every cell, and the gaps are left as they are rather than interpolated.

More in the section Bulletins on environmental protection (electronic versions)»

Period and application

The data is for 2023 and is presented as part of Rosstat environmental protection bulletins. Such statistics are essential for environmental specialists, conservation agency staff, and researchers studying the effectiveness of biological threat management on a national scale. Regular publication of this data helps monitor the financial support for measures to protect territories from harmful organisms across all levels of government