Roschart — Russian statistics in charts

Official Rosstat statistics turned into charts instead of CSV and XLSX

RU

Expenditure on measures to eliminate pest foci in 2020

thousand rubles

· snapshot · rows: 31 · periods: 2 · section: Bulletins on environmental protection (electronic versions)

346355 thousand rubles constituted the total costs for eliminating harmful organism outbreaks nationwide in 2020. In this table, expenditures are broken down by federal districts and individual constituent entities, allowing the distribution of pest control funds to be seen across thirty-one rows. The indicator is measured in thousands of rubles, with a portion of the costs presented in a separate column to facilitate analysis of the expenditure structure for environmental measures in this specific annual period

shown 25 largest of 31

Table of costs for measures to eliminate harmful organism outbreaks in 2020 by Russian regions

Russian Federation 346,355 Siberian Federal District 254,122 Krasnoyarsk Territory 176,232 Far Eastern Federal District 50,259 Irkutsk Region 49,924 Volga Federal District 33,578 Republic of Bashkortostan 21,220 Novosibirsk Oblast 20,800 Orenburg Region 10,419 Southern Federal District 6,188 Kemerovo Region — Kuzbass 4,104 Tomsk Oblast 2,537 Ural Federal District 796.0 Northwestern Federal District 737.0 Central Federal District 675.0 Leningrad Region 485.0 Chelyabinsk Region 446.0 Altai Republic 445.0 Samara Region 372.0 Kurgan Region 350.0 Ivanovo Region 108.0 Republic of Komi 100.0 Republic of Tyva 80.0 Krasnodar Territory 32.0 Chuvash Republic 24.0
how it will look

Set in numbers

31 series in thousand rubles, arranged across 2 breakdowns rather than over time. 56 values in total.

The largest value belongs to “Russian Federation” — 300,757 thousand rubles; the smallest is “Chuvash Republic” at 24 thousand rubles. The gap between them is 12,532-fold.

All table numbers are series: 31
Series Затраты на выполнение мероприятий по ликвидации очагов вредных организмов - всегоиз них:
Российская Федерация 346 355,00 300 757,00
Центральный федеральный округ 675,00 108,00
Ивановская область 108,00 108,00
Смоленская область 567,00 —
Северо-Западный федеральный округ 737,00 585,00
Республика Коми 100,00 100,00
Архангельская область 152,00 —
Архангельская область без автономного округа 152,00 —
Ленинградская область 485,00 485,00
Южный федеральный округ 6 188,00 3 216,00
Краснодарский край 32,00 32,00
Волгоградская область — —
Приволжский федеральный округ 33 578,00 31 790,00
Республика Башкортостан 21 220,00 21 220,00
Чувашская Республика 24,00 24,00
Кировская область 1 543,00 —
Оренбургская область 10 419,00 10 419,00
Самарская область 372,00 127,00
Уральский федеральный округ 796,00 796,00
Курганская область 350,00 350,00
Челябинская область 446,00 446,00
Сибирский федеральный округ 254 122,00 214 003,00
Республика Алтай 445,00 445,00
Республика Тыва 80,00 80,00
Красноярский край 176 232,00 176 232,00
Иркутская область 49 924,00 12 280,00
Кемеровская область - Кузбасс 4 104,00 3 079,00
Новосибирская область 20 800,00 19 350,00
Томская область 2 537,00 2 537,00
Дальневосточный федеральный округ 50 259,00 50 259,00
Республика Бурятия 50 259,00 50 259,00

How to read this table

Table rows vary by geographic coverage, starting with the total for the Russian Federation and ending with data for specific regions, such as the Ivanovo Region. Comparing values is useful for determining the contribution of each federal district to the total expenditure. A separate column shows a portion of the costs, which helps to more accurately understand the funding structure for these works in each of the presented regions or districts, without being limited to the total figure

More in the section Bulletins on environmental protection (electronic versions)»

Period and application

The information reflects the status in 2020 and serves as reference material for environmental protection specialists. Rosstat prepared this breakdown to analyze the efficiency of budget and other fund allocation for the protection of forests and agricultural land. The data will be useful to ecologists, researchers, and agency representatives involved in monitoring territorial biological security

1) Знак (...) означает, что данные не публикуются в целях обеспечения конфиденциальности первичных статистических данных, полученных от респондентов, в соответствии с Федеральным законом от 29.11.2007 г. No 282-ФЗ «Об официальном статистическом учете и системе государственной статистики в Российской Федерации» (п. 5 ст. 4, ч. 1 ст. 9).