Data on museums, eco-trails and visitors at protected areas, 2022 edition
The development of cognitive tourism and environmental education in federal-level natural areas in 2022 is reflected in statistics on the number of museums, eco-trails, and routes. Table rows are categorized by SPNA type, allowing for a comparison of activity scales across different territory types. Data includes information on visitor numbers and facility infrastructure, covering the entire country for the specified year
Chart of environmental education activities and cognitive tourism in federal-level SPNAs in 2022
Set in numbers
This is a cross-section: 5 series across 6 breakdowns. 28 values in total.
The largest value belongs to “TOTAL by categories of wholesale trade of federal significance” — 17.36 million; the smallest is “ИТОГО по категориям ООПТ федерального значения — государственные природные заказники” at 37,004. The gap between them is 469-fold.
All table numbers are series: 5
| Series | Число, ед. — Музеев | Число, ед. — Визит-центров | Число, ед. — Экотроп и Mar | Количество посетителей, чел. — Музеев | Количество посетителей, чел. — Визит-центров | Количество посетителей, чел. — Экотроп и Mar |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ИТОГО по категориям ООПТ федерального значения | 158,00 | 319,00 | 1 754,00 | 1 786 656,00 | 1 521 713,00 | 17 357 499,00 |
| ИТОГО по категориям ООПТ федерального значения — государственные природные заповедники | 71,00 | 143,00 | 514,00 | 723 936,00 | 446 389,00 | 1 628 561,00 |
| ИТОГО по категориям ООПТ федерального значения — национальные парки | 75,00 | 141,00 | 970,00 | 234 550,00 | 1 049 214,00 | 9 342 325,00 |
| ИТОГО по категориям ООПТ федерального значения — государственные природные заказники | — | 7,00 | 43,00 | — | 23 239,00 | 37 004,00 |
| ИТОГО по категориям ООПТ федерального значения — дендрологические парки и ботанические сады | 12,00 | 28,00 | 227,00 | 828 170,00 | 2 871,00 | 6 349 609,00 |
How to read this table
Row differences allow for a comparison of indicators across various federal-level SPNA categories, including state and national parks. It is possible to assess the usage of eco-trails and identify where museums or visitor centers are most concentrated. Comparing totals by category helps clarify the overall structure of cognitive tourism on protected lands
What is visible in these numbers
The table is 93% filled: Rosstat does not publish every cell, and the gaps are left as they are rather than interpolated.
More in the section Bulletins on environmental protection (electronic versions)»
Period and application
2022 data is presented as a single snapshot without annual dynamics. The information is relevant for ecologists, tourism organizers, and environmental specialists. Data on museums and routes in SPNAs helps assess the accessibility of natural sites for visitation
Did you notice an error in this table? The parser is wrong, and most often one correction fixes many pages
Report an error Typo is easier this way: highlight it and press Ctrl + Enter